期刊文献+

高分辨率食管测压联合食管24h pH-阻抗监测对胃食管反流病的诊断意义 被引量:7

Diagnostic significance of high resolution esophageal manometry combined with 24-hour pH impedance monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨高分辨率食管测压联合食管24 h多通道pH-阻抗监测对胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD)食管基线阻抗(baseline impedance,BI)值的影响。方法选取2017年6月至2019年3月到本院就诊具有典型GERD症状的患者150例,其中反流性食管炎(reflux esophagitis,RE)38例(RE组)、非糜烂性反流病(non-erosive reflux disease,NERD)68例(NERD组),功能性烧心(functional heartburn,FH)44例(FH组)。研究对象均行常规胃镜检查、24 h食管pH-阻抗监测和PPI试验,分别分析3组患者食管下括约肌上方3、5、7、9、15、17 cm处(a5通道、a4通道、a3通道、a2通道、a1通道)BI值,使用SPSS22.0统计软件对数据进行分析。结果 RE组、NERD组远端收缩积分(distal contractile integral,DCI)和收缩前沿速度(contractile front velocity,CFV)均显著低于FH组(P<0.05);FH组5个通道食管BI值均显著高于NERD组和RE组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示,NERD组和FH组a5通道食管BI最佳截断值为2 416Ω,曲线下面积为0.92,灵敏度为79.8%(95%CI:0.40~0.87),特异度为93.1%(95%CI:0.48~0.94),阳性预测值为98.3%(95%CI:0.52~0.99),阴性预测值为48.2%(95%CI:0.53~0.90)。NERD组[9.40%(4.46%~25.70%)]和RE组[10.60%(4.71%~24.29%)]食管酸暴露时间(acid exposure time,AET)均显著高于FH组[1.06%(0.20%~2.16%),P<0.05],NERD组AET显著低于RE组(P<0.05);NERD组和RE组BI值均与AET呈负相关(r=-0.651、-0.542,P<0.05)。FH组BI值与AET无相关性(r=-0.402,P=0.240)。结论高分辨率食管测压联合食管24 h多通道pH-阻抗监测结果提示食管远端的BI值2 416Ω可作为鉴别NERD和FH的最佳截断值,食管酸暴露程度与GERD患者食管BI值降低有关。 Objective To investigate the effect of high resolution esophageal manometry combined with 24-hour esophageal multi-channel pH-impedance monitoring on baseline esophageal impedance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD). Methods A total of 150 patients with typical GERD symptoms admitted in our hospital from June 2017 to March 2019 were enrolled in this study. They were divided into reflux esophagitis group(RE, n=38), non-erosive reflux disease group(NERD, n=68) and functional heartburn group(FH, n=44). All subjects underwent routine gastroscopy, 24-hour esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and proton inhibitor(PPI) test. The BI values at 7, 9, 15 and 17 cm(a5 channel, a4 channel, a3 channel, a2 channel, a1 channel) above the lower esophageal sphincter were obtained respectively in the 3 groups, and the results were analyzed by SPSS22.0 statistical software. Results The distal contractile integral(DCI) and contractile front velocity(CFV) in the RE group and NERD group were significantly lower than those in FH group(P<0.05). The BI values at the 5 channels of esophagus were obviously higher in the FH group than the NERD group and the RE group(P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve analysis showed that the best cut-off value of esophageal BI of A5 channel in NERD group and FH group was 2 416 Ω, and the area under curve(AUC) was 0.92. And the sensitivity was 79.8%(95%CI: 0.40~0.87), specificity was 93.1%(95%CI: 0.48~0.94), positive predictive value was 98.3%(95%CI: 0.52~0.99), and negative predictive value was 48.2%(95%CI: 0.53~0.90). The acid exposure time(AET) was significantly longer in the NERD group [9.40%(4.46%~25.70%)] group and the RE group [10.60%(4.71%~24.29%)] when compared with the FH group [1.06%(0.20%~2.16%), P<0.05], and obvious difference was seen in the former 2 groups(P<0.05). The BI values in the NERD group and the RE group were negatively correlated with AET respectively(r=-0.651,-0.542, P<0.05), but no such correlation was seen in the FH group(r=-0.402, P=0.240). Conclusion The results of high-resolution esophageal manometry combined with 24-hour multichannel pH impedance monitoring indicate that the BI value at 2 416 Ω of the distal esophagus is the best cut-off value for distinguishing NERD and FH. The degree of esophageal acid exposure is associated with the decrease of BI value of the esophagus in GERD patients.
作者 雷鸽 刘新群 范筱 王学祥 LEI Ge;LIU Xinqun;FAN Xiao;WANG Xuexiang(Digestive Laboratory,Second People's Hospital of Nanyang City,Nanyang,Henan Province,473000,China;Department of Gastroenterology,Second People's Hospital of Nanyang City,Nanyang,Henan Province,473000,China)
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第11期1141-1145,共5页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
基金 河南省卫计委项目(2018020985)。
关键词 食管测压 抗阻监测 基线阻抗 胃食管 esophageal manometry resistance monitoring baseline impedance gastroesophagus
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献56

  • 1中华医学会儿科学分会消化学组.小儿胃食管反流病诊断治疗方案(试行)[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(2):96-96. 被引量:58
  • 2袁耀宗,邹多武,汤玉茗,许国铭.胃食管反流病的蒙特利尔(Montreal)定义和分类——基于循证医学的全球共识[J].中华消化杂志,2006,26(10):686-689. 被引量:109
  • 3林三仁,许国铭,胡品津,周丽雅,陈旻湖,柯美云,袁耀宗,房殿春,萧树东.中国胃食管反流病共识意见(2006·10三亚)[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(2):170-173. 被引量:183
  • 4林三仁,许国铭,胡品津,周丽雅,陈旻湖,柯美云,袁耀宗,房殿春,萧树东.中国胃食管反流病共识意见[J].胃肠病学,2007,12(4):233-239. 被引量:528
  • 5丁雪梅.儿童反复肺炎的病因分析.中华现代临床医学杂志,2009,:216-216.
  • 6Lightdale JR, Gremse DA. Gastroesophageal reflux: management guidance for the pediatrician[J]. Pediatrics, 2013, 131(5): e1684-e1695.
  • 7Hegar B, Vandenplas Y. Gastroesophageal reflux: natural evolution, diagnostic approach and treatment[J]. Turk J Pediatr, 2013, 55(1): 1-7.
  • 8Karoui S, Ben Temime H, Serghini M, et al. 24-hour esophageal impedanee-ph monitoring: technical aspects, indications and results[J]. Tunis Med. 2012, 90(5): 351-356.
  • 9Mousa HM, Rosen R, Woodley FW, et al. Esophageal impedance monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2011, 52(2): 129-139.
  • 10Olivier F, Brossard E. Advantages of pH-impedance monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux and dysphagia investigations[J]. Rev Med Suisse, 2008, 4(173): 2103-2106.

共引文献41

同被引文献67

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部