期刊文献+

肌内效贴对延迟性肌肉酸痛影响的Meta分析 被引量:10

A meta-analysis of kinesio taping in the treatment of delayed onset muscle soreness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:既往研究显示肌内效贴对延迟性肌肉酸痛疗效尚不一致。目的:运用Meta分析方法综合定量评价肌内效贴对延迟性肌肉酸痛的疗效,旨在为此技术的临床应用提供理论依据。方法:检索从中国知网、万方数字资源数据库、Web of Science、PubMed、EBSCO等数据库中关于肌内效贴治疗延迟性肌肉酸痛的随机对照试验,检索时限从数据库建库至2019年10月。采用Cochrane协作网中随机对照试验偏倚风险评价标准进行方法学质量评估,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。采用Stata 15.0进行Meta回归分析。结果与结论:最终纳入9项随机对照试验,共382例患者。Meta分析发现,肌内效贴组主观疼痛评分(目测类比评分)明显低于无刺激组[SMD=-0.85,95%CI(-1.32,-0.39),P=0.0003],肌内效贴组肌酸激酶水平较无刺激组差异无显著性意义[SMD=0.30,95%CI(-0.17,0.76),P=0.21];与假刺激组相比,主观疼痛评分[SMD=-0.20,95%CI(-0.46,0.06),P=0.13]和肌酸激酶水平[SMD=0.22,95%CI(-0.06,0.49),P=0.12]差异均无显著性意义。提示肌内效贴可能有利于减轻延迟性肌肉酸痛患者主观疼痛程度,其疗效存在安慰剂效应。 BACKGROUND:Previous studies have shown the inconsistent efficacy of kinesio taping on delayed onset muscle soreness.OBJECTIVE:To quantitatively evaluate the effect of kinesio taping on delayed onset muscle soreness by means of Meta-analysis,in order to provide theoretical basis for the clinical application of this technique.METHODS:Randomized controlled trials of kinesio taping for treatment of delayed onset muscle soreness was retrieved from CNKI,WanFang,Web of Science,PubMed,EBSCO and other databases.The retrieval time was from inception to October 2019.The risk assessment criteria for RCT bias in the Cochrane collaboration were used for methodological quality assessment,and the RevMan 5.3 software was used for Meta-analysis.Meta-regression analysis was performed using Stata 15.0.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Nine RCTs were finally included,with a total of 382 patients.Meta-analysis results showed that the subjective pain score(visual analogue scale)in the kinesio taping group was significantly lower than that in the non-stimulation group[standard mean difference(SMD)=-0.85,95%confidence interval(CI)(-1.32,-0.39),P=0.0003],and the creatine kinase level in the kinesio taping group was not significantly different from that in the non-stimulation group[SMD=0.30,95%CI(-0.17,0.76),P=0.21].Compared with the false stimulation group,the kinesio taping group showed no significant difference in the subjective pain score[SMD=-0.20,95%CI(-0.46,0.06),P=0.13)]and creatine kinase level[SMD=0.22,95%CI(-0.06,0.49),P=0.12].It suggests that kinesio taping may be beneficial to reduce subjective pain in patients with delayed onset muscle soreness,and there is a placebo effect.
作者 耿治中 裴子文 言功立 陈建 Geng Zhizhong;Pei Ziwen;Yan Gongli;Chen Jian(Graduate School,Wuhan Sports University,Wuhan 430079,Hubei Province,China;Department of Rehabilitation,the First Hospital of Wuhan,Wuhan 430022,Hubei Province,China;School of Health Science,Wuhan Sports University,Wuhan 430079,Hubei Province,China)
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第35期5733-5740,共8页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
关键词 延迟性肌肉酸痛 肌内效贴 随机对照试验 主观疼痛评分 血清肌酸激酶 安慰剂效应 肌肉酸痛 META分析 delayed onset muscle soreness kinesio taping randomized controlled trials subjective pain rating serum creatine kinase placebo effect muscle soreness Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献170

  • 1董英,赵耐青.重复测量资料方差分析中主效应意义的探讨[J].复旦学报(医学版),2005,32(6):682-686. 被引量:23
  • 2杨志贤.三种放松手段对减轻延迟性肌肉酸痛效果的比较研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2007,27(4):119-121. 被引量:13
  • 3Higgins JPT,Green S.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[EB/OL].The Cochrane Collaboration,2011[2012-03-30].http:∥www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 4Grimes DA,Schulz KF.An overview of clinical research:the lay of the land[J].Lancet,2002,359(9300):57-61.
  • 5Verhagen AP,de Vet HC,de Bie RA,et al.The Delphi list:a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1998,51(12):1235-1241.
  • 6Centre for Evidence-Based Physiotherapy at The George Institute for Global Health.Physiotherapy Evidence Database(PEDro)[CP/OL].(1999-06-21)[2012-03-30].http://Available from http://www.pedro.org.au/english/downloads/pedro-scale.
  • 7Chalmers TC,Smith H Jr,Blackburn B,et al.A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial[J].Control Clin Trials,1981,2(1):31-49.
  • 8Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).RCT checklist_14.10.10[EP/OL].[2012-03-30].http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP_RCT_Appraisal_Checklist_14oct10.pdf.
  • 9Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary[J]?Control Clin Trials,1996,17(1):1-12.
  • 10Schulz KF,Altman DG,Moher D,CONSORT Group.CONSORT 2010 statement:updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials[J].Int J Surg,2011,9(8):672-677.

共引文献586

同被引文献145

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部