期刊文献+

产褥期女性阴道微生态分析 被引量:3

Analysis of vaginal microgenesis in women during puerperium
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨产褥期女性阴道微生态的变化,为临床预防和控制产妇阴道菌群失衡提供参考依据。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2018年12月在医院妇科门诊就诊的产后6~8周复查产妇共1000例作为研究组,选取同期参加体检的正常非妊娠妇女1000名作为对照组。采用阴道微生态评价体系进行微生态评价。结果研究组的优势菌主要为菌群抑制状态,占比58.40%,对照组主要为革兰阳性杆菌,占比77.20%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(X^2=1499.89,P<0.001);研究组菌群密集度主要为未见细菌状态,占比58.40%,对照组主要为Ⅲ级,占比73.40%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(X^2=1582.39,P<0.001);研究组菌群多样性主要为未见细菌状态,占比58.40%,对照组主要为Ⅱ级,占比82.40%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(X^2=1389.13,P<0.001);研究组Nugengt评分中,中间型占的比例最大,占比74.80%,对照组以0~3分比例最大,为73.70%(737/1000),两组比较差异有统计学意义(X^2=778.63,P<0.001);研究组AV评分中,5~6分占的比例最大,占比72.40%,对照组以<3分比例最大,占比75.30%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(X^2=1248.94,P<0.001)。结论产褥期女性阴道微生态失衡较多,临床医生及处于这一时期的女性应引起高度重视。 Objective To explore the changes of female reproductive tract microecology during puerperium,and to provide reference for clinical prevention and control of maternal flora imbalance.Methods Retrospective analysis of a total of 1000 cases of maternal review in the postpartum period of 6-8 weeks from January 2018 to December 2018 in the gynecology clinic of the hospital as research group.The control group included 1000 normal non-pregnant women who attended the physical examination during the same period.Vaginal microecological evaluation system was adopted for microecological evaluation.Results The dominant bacteria in the research group were mainly flora inhibition,accounting for 58.40%,and the control group was mainly Gram-positive Bacillus,accounting for 77.20%,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(X^2=1499.89,P<0.001).The concentration of bacteria in the study group was mainly no bacterial state,accounting for 58.40%,and the control group was mainlyⅢ,accounting for 73.40%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(X^2=1582.39,P<0.001).The diversity of flora in the study group was mainly no bacterial status,accounting for 58.40%,and the control group was mainlyⅡ,accounting for 82.40%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(X^2=1389.13,P<0.001).In the Nugengt score of the study group,the middle type accounted for the largest proportion 74.80%,and the control group had the highest ratio of 0-3 points,which was 73.70%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(X^2=778.63,P<0.001).In the AV score of the research group,5-6 scored the most,with 72.40%,and the control group had the largest proportion of 3 scores,accounting for 75.30%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(X^2=1248.94,P<0.001).Conclusion The female vagina microecological imbalance is more in the puerperium period,and clinicians and women in this period should be highly valued.
作者 王晓娜 丛桂敏 曹作伟 佟成龙 Wang Xiaona;Cong Guimin;Cao Zuowei;Tong Chenglong(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Shenyang Women and Children Hospital,Shenyang,Liaoning,110011,China)
出处 《当代医学》 2020年第18期98-100,共3页 Contemporary Medicine
基金 辽宁省自然科学基金(20170540837)。
关键词 产褥期 阴道微生态 菌群失衡 Puerperal period Reproductive tract microecology Mycelial imbalance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol, 1991, 29: 297- 301.
  • 2Donders GG. Definition and classification of abnormal vaginal flora. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 21:355-373.
  • 3Said S, Johansson ED, Gemzell C. Serum oestrogens and progesterone after normal delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, 1973, 80:542-545.
  • 4中华医学会妇产科学分会感染性疾病协作组.细菌性阴道病诊治指南(草案).中华妇产科杂志,2011,46:317.
  • 5肖冰冰,张岱,廖秦平,刘朝晖.妊娠期阴道菌群的微生态评价[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2007,8(6):412-414. 被引量:56
  • 6Sobel JD. Vulvovaginal candidosis [ J ]. Lancet , 2007,9,369 (9577) :1961-1971.
  • 7Weissenbacber TM, Witkin SS , Gingelmaier A, et al. Relationship between recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis and immune mediators in vaginal fluid [ J ]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio ,2009,5,144 ( 1 ) :59-63.
  • 8Anderson BL, Susan Cu-Uvin S, Raker CA, et al. Subtle perturbations of genital mieroflora alter mucosal immunity among low-risk pregnant women [ J ]. Aeta Obstet Gyneeol Seand , 2011, 90(5) :510-515.
  • 9Gregorio PR, Juez Tom MS, Leceese Terraf MC, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of beneficial vaginal laetobacilli on pathogens responsible for urogenital tract infections [ J ]. J Med Mierobiol, 2014,63 (5) :685-696.
  • 10Zhang R, Daroczy K, Xiao B, et al. Qualitative and semiquantitativeanalysis of Laetobacillus species in the vaginal of healthy fertile andpostmenopausal Chinese women [ J ]. J Med Mierobio1,2012,61 ( 5 ) :729-739.

共引文献357

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部