期刊文献+

不同支配关系的多目标算法的柔性作业调度 被引量:2

Flexible Job Scheduling Based on Multi-objective Algorithms with Different Dominance Relationship
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了提高多目标进化算法所获得解的质量,研究者做了大量的研究,传统的基于Pareto支配关系的多目标进化算法具有一定的局限性;论文以不同的支配关系与NSGA-II算法相结合,对单机器人搬运的柔性作业车间调度的多目标优化问题进行求解,通过实验比较分析了不同方法在多目标优化问题求解中的优劣性;在此以NSGA-II为框架结合Lorenz支配关系和CDAS(control dominance area of solutions)支配关系以及传统的基Pareto支配关系的NSGA-II3种算法去研究同一优化调度问题,发现基于Lorenz支配关系和CDAS支配关系的优化算法比基于传统的Pareto支配关系的优化算法的效果更佳。 In order to improve the quality of the solution obtained by the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm,researchers have done a lot of research.The traditional multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on the Pareto dominance relationship has certain limitations.This paper combines different dominance relationships with NSGA-II(Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm)algorithm,the multi-objective optimization problem of flexible job shop scheduling with single robot handling is solved,and different methods are used to analyze multi-objective optimization problems through experimental comparison and analysis.Pros and cons in solving.Here,using NSGA-II as the framework to combine Lorenz dominance relationship and CDAS(Control Dominance Area of Solutions)dominance relationship and traditional NSGA-II algorithms based on traditional Pareto dominance relationship to study the same optimal scheduling problem,and found that based on Lorenz dominance relationship and CDAS dominance relationship optimization algorithm performs better than the traditional Pareto dominance relationship optimization algorithm.
作者 李晓辉 刁林倩 张秀 赵毅 李杰 Li Xiaohui;Diao Linqian;Zhang Xiu;Zhao Yi;Li Jie(School of Electronic and Control Engineering,Chang an University,Xi an 710064,China;Shaanxi Automobile Group Co.,Ltd.,Xi an 710119,China)
出处 《计算机测量与控制》 2020年第6期158-164,共7页 Computer Measurement &Control
基金 西安市科技项目(201805045YD23CG29) 陕西省自然科学基金(2018JM5165)。
关键词 单机器人搬运 柔性作业车间调度 多目标优化问题 不同支配关系 single robot handling flexible job shop scheduling multi-objective optimization problem various dominance relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献72

  • 1ISHIBUCHI H, TSUKAMOTO N, NOJIMA Y. Evolutionary many- objective optimization: a short review [C] //Proceedings of 2008 1EEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Hong Kong: IEEE, 2008:2424 - 2431.
  • 2SCHUTZE O, LARA A, COELLO C C A. On the influence of the number of objectives on the hardness of a multiobjective optimiza- tion problem [J]. 1EEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2011, 15(4): 444 - 455.
  • 3DEB K, KUMAR A. Interactive evolutionary multi-objective opti- mization and decision-making using reference direction method [C] //Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolu- tionary Computation. London: ACM, 2007:781 - 788.
  • 4SAID L B, BECHIKH S, GHEDIRA K. The r-dominance: a new dominance relation for interactive evolutionary multicriteria decision making [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2010, 14(5): 801 - 818.
  • 5THIELE L, MIETTINEN K, KORHONEN P J, et al. A preference- based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2009, 17(3): 411 - 436.
  • 6KENNEDY J, EBERHART R C. Particle swarm optimization [C] //Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1995:1942 - 1948.
  • 7ZHANG E Z, WU Y E CHEN Q W. A practical approach for solv- ing multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation problems using extended bare-bones particle swarm optimization [J]. Reliability En- gineering & System Safety, 2014, 127:65 -76.
  • 8WICKRAMASINGHE U K, LI X. Using a distance metric to guide pso algorithms for many-objective optimization [C] //Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computa- tion. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: ACM, 2009:667 - 674.
  • 9CARVALHO A B, POZO A. Measuring the convergence and di- versity of CDAS multi-objective particle swarm optimization algo- rithms: a study of many-objective problems [J]. Neurocomputing, 2012, 75(1): 43 -51.
  • 10HIRANO H, YOSHIKAWA T. A study on two-step search based on PSO to improve convergence and diversity for many-objective opti- mization problems [C] IIProceedings of 2013 IEEE Congress on Evo- lutionary Computation. Cancun, Mexico: IEEE, 2013:1854 - 1859.

共引文献65

同被引文献41

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部