期刊文献+

Ⅱ期乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结结外侵犯截点值的分析 被引量:1

Analysis of the cut-off value of extranodal invasion of axillary lymph node in patients with stageⅡbreast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Ⅱ期乳腺癌阳性腋窝淋巴结结外侵犯(extranodal extension,ENE)的临床意义及影响预后的ENE垂直直径的截点值。方法回顾性分析河北医科大学第四医院2008年1月1日~2012年12月31日存档的原发非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌改良根治手术标本287例,所有患者均有1~3枚腋窝淋巴结转移,镜下观察腋窝淋巴结转移及ENE情况,测量ENE的垂直直径,结合其他临床病理特征分析其对患者预后的影响。结果287例中有ENE者80例,阳性率为27.9%,ENE的垂直直径中位数为2.5 mm(0.5~12 mm)。肿瘤直径越大、临床分期越晚、淋巴结转移数越多,ENE的发生率越高;ER阴性者比阳性者发生率更高(P<0.05)。Kaplan-Meier单因素生存分析结果显示,腋窝淋巴结ENE阳性患者的5年无瘤生存(disease free survival,DFS)率及总生存(overall survival,OS)率分别为55.8%和84.4%,低于阴性组的90.6%和95.1%,5年DFS和OS时间均缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Cox多因素生存分析结果显示,ENE阳性、HER-2阳性、分子分型是影响Ⅱ期乳腺癌患者DFS和OS的独立危险因素;ER阳性患者与较好的预后相关。以ENE垂直直径3 mm为截点,>3 mm是影响患者DFS和OS的独立危险因素,与≤3 mm组相比,对5年DFS及OS影响的相对危险度分别为4.251(95%CI:2.382~7.586)和2.806(95%CI:1.146~6.883)。结论腋窝淋巴结ENE可能是Ⅱ期乳腺癌不良预后的指标之一。ENE垂直直径是预后影响因素的独立预测指标,ENE垂直直径>3 mm有望作为乳腺癌患者预后风险预测的截点值应用于临床诊疗决策。 Purpose To investigate the clinical significance of extranodal extension(ENE)of positive axillary lymph node in stageⅡbreast cancer and the cut-off value of the vertical diameter affecting prognosis.Methods 287 cases of modified radical mastectomy specimens of primary non-specific invasive breast cancer filed in the department of pathology,the Fourth Hospital,Hebei Medical University from January 1,2008 to December 31,2012 were analyzed retrospectively.All patients had 1 to 3 axillary lymph nodes metastasis.The metastasis of axillary lymph nodes and ENE were observed under microscope,and the vertical diameter of ENE was measured,and its effect on prognosis was analyzed combining other clinicopathological parameters.Results Of the 287 patients,ENE was present in 80 patients(27.9%).The median vertical diameter of ENE was 2.5 mm(0.5-12 mm).The incidence of ENE increased with the enlargement of the maximum diameter of tumors,the later of clinical stage and the increase of lymph node metastasis,and the frequency of ENE in ER negative patients was higher than that in ER positive patients(P<0.05).Kaplan-Meier univariate survival results showed that 5-year disease free survival(DFS)rate and 5-year overall survival(OS)rate were 55.8%and 84.4%in ENE positive axillary lymph nodes,which were lower than that in negative lymph nodes(90.6%and 95.1%).The 5-year DFS and OS time were shortened,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Cox multivariate survival analysis showed that ENE positive,HER-2 positive and molecular typing were independent risk factors for DFS and OS in patients with stageⅡbreast cancer.ER positive patients were associated with better prognosis.Compared with≤3 mm group,the relative risk of 5-year DFS and OS was 4.251(95%CI:2.382-7.586)and 2.806(95%CI:1.146-6.883).Conclusion The presence of ENE in axillary lymph nodes may be one of the indicators of poor prognosis in stageⅡbreast cancer.The vertical diameter of ENE is an independently prognostic marker.The vertical diameter of ENE>3 mm is expected to be used as a cut-off point for predicting the prognostic risk of breast cancer patients in clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions.
作者 张玲玲 蔡丽静 李芳 张勐 刘月平 ZHANG Ling-ling;CAI Li-jing;LI Fang;ZHANG Meng;LIU Yue-ping(Department of Pathology,the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang050011,China)
出处 《临床与实验病理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第5期510-514,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
基金 2016年度医学科学研究重点课题计划项目(20160189) 河北省政府资助省级临床医学优秀人才项目(201603479)。
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 淋巴结结外侵犯 预后 breast neoplasm extranodal extension of lymph node prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Colditz G A, Bohlke K. Priorities for the primary prevention of breast cancer[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014,64(3) :186 -94.
  • 2Perou C M, Sorlie T, Eisen M B, et at. Molecular portraits of hu?man breast tumors [J]. Nature, 2000,406 (6797) : 747 - 52.
  • 3Leong S P, Shen Z Z, Liu T J, et at. Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western countries [J] ? World J Surg, 2010, 34(10):2308-14.
  • 4Carey LA, Perou C M, Livasy C A, et at. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J] . JAMA, 2006,295(21) :2492 -502.
  • 5Ihemelandu C U, Leffall LSD, Dewitty R L, et at. Molecular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal and postmenopausal Afri?can-American women: age-specific prevalence and survival [J]. J Surg Res, 2007,143 (I) : 109 - 18.
  • 6Onitilo A A, Engel J M, Greenlee R T, et at. Breast cancer sub?types based on ER/PR and HER -2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival [J]. Clin Med Res, 2009, 7(1-2):4-13.
  • 7Spitale A, Mazzola P, Soldini D, et at. Breast cancer classifica?tion according to immunohistochemical markers: clinicopathologic features and short-term survival analysis in a population-based study from the South of Switzerland [J]. Ann Oncol, 2009, 20 (4) :628 -35.
  • 8Montagna E, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, et at. Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: histologic subtyping to inform the outcome [J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2013,13 (1) : 31 - 9.
  • 9Nassar A. Cohen C. Cotsonis G, et at. Significance of intramam?mary lymph nodes in the staging of breast cancer: correlation with tumor characteristics and outcome [J]. Breast J, 2008, 14 : 147 - 52.
  • 10Taghian A, Jeong J H, Mamounas E. et at. Patterns of locoregion?al failure in patients with operable breast cancer treated by mastec?tomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen and without radiotherapy: results from five national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project randomized clinical trials [J]. Clin on?col, 2004,22(21) :4247 -54.

共引文献44

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部