1Toulmin S. E.. The uses of argument. London: Cambridge Un- iversity Press, 1958:87-99.
2Erduran S., Simon S., Osborne J.. TAPping into argumentati- on:Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pa- ttern for studying seienee discourse. Seienee Edueation, 2004, 88(6):915-933.
3Driver R., Newton P., Osborne J.. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.Science Education,2000, 84(3):287-313.
4Kuhn D.. Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 1993, 77 (3): 319-337.
5Driver R., Asoko H., Leach J. et al. Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 1994, 23 (7):5-12.
6Newton P., Driver R., Osborne J.. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science.International Journal of Sci- ence Education, 1999, 21(5): 553-576.
7Dusehl R., Ellenbogan K., Erduran S.. Promoting argumenta- tion in middle school science classrooms: A Project SEPIA e- valuation. A paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
8Felton M. K.. The development of discourse strategies in ad- olescent argument. Cognitive Development,2004,19(1):35-52.
9Aufschnaiter C., Erdurane S., Osborne J. et al. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' ar- gumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of r- esearch in science teaching, 2008,45(1):101-131.
10Sampson V., Walker J., Dial K. et al. Learning to write in undergraduate chemistry: The impact of Argument-Driven In- quiry.Paper presented at the 2010 Annual International Con- ference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Philadelphia, PA.
