期刊文献+

海上浮动核电站人员认知可靠性模型 被引量:9

Human cognitive reliability model of marine floating nuclear power plants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了保障海上浮动核电站的安全运行,利用人员认知可靠性(HCR)模型,分析海上浮动核电站的人因可靠性。首先通过分析和量化海上微气候、噪声、船体运动等外部因素对操纵员的操作速度和准确度的影响,修正HCR模型;然后以海上浮动核电站失水事故(LOCA)为例,分析事故中涉及人员行为以及事故处理流程,根据事故发生的情景对各计算参数取值;最后计算操纵员对反应堆LOCA事故系统异常信号认知和响应的失败概率。结果表明:计算结果与实际较为吻合,修正后的HCR模型可操作性较强。 In order to guarantee safe operation of marine floating nuclear power plants,human factor reliability of them is analyzed by using HCR model. Firstly,influence of external factors such as ocean microclimate,noise and hull motion on operating speed and accuracy was analyzed and quantified,and HCR model was modified. Then,with LOCA of marine floating nuclear power plants as an example,behaviors of people involved in the accident and their handling process were analyzed before values of calculation parameters were obtained according to accident scenarios. Finally, failure probability of operator’s recognition of and response to abnormal LOCA signals was calculated. The results show that calculated results are in good agreement with actual situation,and the modified HCR model has greater operability.
作者 邹树梁 黄斌海 李书帆 ZOU Shuliang;HUANG Binhai;LI Shufan(School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering,University of South China,Hengyang Hunan 421001,China;Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Emergency Safety Technology and Equipment for Nuclear Facilities,Hengyang Hunan 421001,China)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期1-6,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国防科技工业核动力技术创新中心科研项目(HDLCXZX-2018-HB-016)。
关键词 海上浮动核电站 人员认知可靠性(HCR) 外部因素 人因可靠性 失水事故(LOCA) marine floating nuclear power plant human cognitive reliability(HCR) external factors human reliability loss of coolant accident(LOCA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1隽志才,曹鹏,吴文静.基于认知心理学的驾驶员交通标志视认性理论分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(8):8-11. 被引量:67
  • 2徐德蜀.安全文化、安全科技与科学安全生产观[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(3):71-82. 被引量:128
  • 3谢红卫,孙志强,李欣欣,李政仪,张明,史秀建,李龙.典型人因可靠性分析方法评述[J].国防科技大学学报,2007,29(2):101-107. 被引量:51
  • 4黄祥瑞.可靠性工程[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1991.258-262.
  • 5张力 黄曙东 黄祥瑞 等.岭澳核电站人因可靠性分析[M].北京:原子能出版社,2001..
  • 6SALAS E, DICKINSON T L, CONVERSE S A, et al. Toward an understanding of team per- formance and training, in teams: Their training and performance [M]. Norwood, NJ (USA) Ablex Publishing Co. , 1992: 3-29.
  • 7SASOUA K, REASON J. Team errors: Defini- tion and taxonomy[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1999, 65: 1-9.
  • 8CHANG Y H J, MOSLEH A. Cognitive model- ing and dynamic probabilistic simulation of oper- ating crew response to complex system accidents- Part 1: Overview of the IDAC model[J]. Relia- bility Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92 (8): 997-1 013.
  • 9CHANG Y H J, MOSLEH A. Cognitive model- ing and dynamic probabilistic simulation of oper- ating crew response to complex system accidents- Part 2: IDAC performance influencing factors model [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(8): 1 014-1 040.
  • 10CHANG Y H J, MOSLEH A. Cognitive model- ing and dynamic probabilistic simulation of oper- ating crew response to complex system accidents- Part 3: IDAC operator response model[J]. Reli- ability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92 (8): 1 041-1 060.

共引文献78

同被引文献89

引证文献9

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部