期刊文献+

基于一般均衡的城市交通公平模拟研究 被引量:1

Simulation Research of Urban Transportation Equity Based on General Equilibrium Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探究城市均衡状态下不同收入群体面临的交通公平问题,建立城市空间一般均衡模型.从多主体模拟的视角出发,构建企业、个人的选址决策模型,采用仿真模拟方法探讨交通公平的形成机制与影响因素,为交通公平问题提供新的研究视角.研究发现:不同群体的通勤损失存在明显差异,高收入群体在空间选择上优先于低收入群体,占据交通优势区域;低收入群体不仅需要接受较低的工资水平,还需承受更高的通勤损失.劳动力水平差距和通勤速度对不同群体的通勤损失存在异质性影响.当劳动力水平差距扩大时,低收入群体不仅面临劳动力贬值,还将承受更大比例的通勤损失;公共交通出现拥挤、维护等低效情况时,低收入群体的通勤损失将明显增加,进一步扩大群体差距. Based on the general equilibrium model of urban space,this paper studies a transportation equity problem faced by high and low income groups under the condition of urban equilibrium with a multi-agent simulation approach.It constructs a site selection decision model for enterprises and individuals,and discusses the formation mechanism and influencing factors of the transportation equity problem by simulation,so as to provide a new research perspective for transportation equity.It is found that the high-income groups have priority over the low-income group in spatial selection.Low-income groups do not only need to accept lower level of wages,but also suffer higher commuting losses.Moreover,the difference in labor level and commuting speed have heterogeneous effects on the commuting loss of different groups.The widening of the capacity gap between the two groups will worsen the issue of transportation equity.When the efficiency of public transportation system is reduced,such as congestion,the commuting loss of low-income groups will increase significantly,and the transportation inequality is more serious.
作者 张晨楠 郑吉阳 杨赞 ZHANG Chen-nan;ZHENG Ji-yang;YANG Zan(Hang Lung Center for Real Estate,Department of Construction Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第3期33-38,共6页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(71673154).
关键词 城市交通 交通公平 一般均衡模型 城市空间均衡 通勤损失 urban traffic transportation equity general equilibrium model urban space equilibrium commuting loss
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1LITMAN T. Evaluating Transportation Equity: Guidance for Incorporation Distributional Impact [ J ]. World Transport Policy & Practice, 2002, 8 (2) : 50 - 65.
  • 2LITMAN T. Social Inclusion as a Transport Planning Issue in Canada [ R/OL]. Transport and Social Exclusion G7 Comparison Seminar, 2003 - 04 - 04 [ 2012 - 03 - 21 ]. http: //www. vtpi. org.
  • 3BELINDA M, WU Julian, HINE P. A PTAL Approach to Measuring Changes in Bus Service Accessibility [ J ]. Transport Policy, 2003, 10 (4) : 307 - 320.
  • 4BEARSE P, GURMU S, RAPAPORT C, et al. Paratransit Demand of Disabled People [ J ]. Transportation Research Part B, 2004, 38 (9) : 809 -831.
  • 5梁金鉴.政府投资地区公路项目兼顾公平与效率的优先级评价研究[D].北京:清华大学,2007.
  • 6DELBOSC A, CURRIE G. Using Lorenz Curves to Assess Public Transport Equity [ J ]. Journal of Transport Geogrephy, 2011, 19 (2): 1252-1259.
  • 7SILVA H, TATAM C. An Empirical Procedure for Enhancing the Impact of Road Investments [ J ]. Transport Policy, 1996, 3 (4): 201-211.
  • 8AHMED Q I, LU Huapu, YE Shi. Urban Transportation and Equity : A Case Study of Beijing and Karachi [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A, 2008, 42 (1): 125 - 139.
  • 9ALBERTA G, MAHALEL D. Congestion Tolls and Parking Fees: A Comparison of the Potential Effect on Travel Behavior [ J ]. Transport Policy, 2006, 13 (6) : 496 - 502.
  • 10吴兵,董治,李林波.城市公共交通规划中的民众参与问题研究[J].山东交通学院学报,2008,16(2):32-35. 被引量:7

共引文献24

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部