期刊文献+

富自体浓缩生长因子纤维蛋白液联合Bio-Oss骨粉对口腔种植引导性骨再生术后黏膜愈合和骨缺损再生的影响 被引量:15

Effect of autologous concentrated growth factor fibrin solution combined with Bio-Oss bone powder on mucosal healing and bone regeneration after oral implanted guided bone regeneration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨富自体浓缩生长因子纤维蛋白液联合Bio-Oss骨粉对口腔种植引导性骨再生术后黏膜愈合和骨缺损再生的影响.方法:选择2016年10月-2018年12月濮阳市油田总医院口腔科接诊的83例上颌单个前牙缺失伴唇侧骨缺损患者,将其分为2组,实验组(42例)采用富自体浓缩生长因子纤维蛋白液+Bio-Oss骨粉引导骨再生,对照组(41例)采用Bio-Oss骨粉引导骨再生.随访2组患者术后7d、6周、1年手术区黏膜愈合程度、种植体成功率、骨缺损再生情况、疼痛程度和其他并发症等的发生情况.观察2组种植体成功率和术后并发症,以及术后黏膜颜色、肿胀程度、出血指数、探诊深度、附着丧失、植骨高度、成骨厚度的差异.采用SPSS 25.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析.结果:2组种植体成功率无统计学差异(95.24%∶97.56%,P>0.05),实验组并发症发生率显著低于对照组(2.38%∶14.63%,P<0.05),实验组黏膜颜色、肿胀度评分显著低于对照组[(0.65±0.03)分∶(2.01±0.15)分、(1.10±.37)分∶(2.69±0.54)分,P<0.05],出血指数、探诊深度、附着丧失显著低于对照组[(0.35±0.05)∶(0.49±0.09)、(3.39±.62)mm∶(4.41±0.95)mm、(3.02±0.66)mm∶(5.31±0.91)mm,P<0.05],植骨高度、成骨高度显著高于对照组[(2.61±0.50)mm∶(2.20±0.31)mm、(2.53±0.34)mm∶(2.02±0.27)mm,P<0.05],实验组术后疼痛程度显著低于对照组(P<0.05).结论:富自体浓缩生长因子纤维蛋白液联合Bio-Oss骨粉可有效促进口腔种植引导骨再生术后黏膜愈合和骨缺损再生,减轻术后疼痛和并发症. PURPOSE:To investigate the effect of autologous concentrated growth factor fibrin solution combined with Bio-Oss bone powder on mucosal healing and bone regeneration after oral implanted guided bone regeneration.METHODS:From October 2016 to December 2018,83 patients with maxillary single anterior tooth loss and labial bone defect were treated,they were divided into two groups.Patients in the experimental group(42 cases)received autologous concentrated growth factor fibrin solution+Bio-Oss bone powder,while patients in the control group(41 cases)received Bio-Oss bone powder alone.The degree of mucosal healing,implant success,bone defect regeneration,pain and other complications were followed up 7 days,6 weeks and 1 year after operation.The success rate and complications of the two groups were observed,as well as the differences of mucosal color,swelling degree,bleeding index,depth of probing,attachment loss,height of bone graft and thickness of bone formation were measured and recorded.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software package.RESULTS:There was no significant difference in the success rate of implants between the two groups(95.24%vs 97.56%,P>0.05).The complication rate of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group(2.38%vs 14.63%,P<0.05).The mucosal color and swelling degree scores of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group[(0.65±0.03)points vs(2.01±0.15)points,(1.10±0.37)points vs(2.69±0.54)points,P<0.05],and the bleeding index,probing depth,and attachment loss were significantly lower than the control group[(0.35±0.05)vs(0.49±0.09),(3.39±0.62)mm vs(4.41±0.95)mm,(3.02±0.66)mm vs(5.31±0.91)mm,P<0.05],bone graft height and osteogenesis height were significantly higher than the control group[(2.61±0.50)mm vs(2.20±0.31)mm,(2.53±0.34)mm vs(2.02±0.27)mm,P<0.05].The degree of postoperative pain in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Rich self-concentrating growth factor fibrin solution combined with Bio-Oss bone powder can effectively promote mucosal healing and bone regeneration after oral implant-guided bone regeneration,and reduce postoperative pain and complications.
作者 林勇 毛驰 侯丹 常晓荣 张军华 赵献银 LIN Yong;MAO Chi;HOU Dan;CHANG Xiao-rong;ZHANG Jun-hua;ZHAO Xian-yin(Department of Stomatology,Puyang Oilfield General Hospital.Puyang 457001,Henan Province;Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Peking University Hospital of Stomatology.Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第3期316-320,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词 富自体浓缩生长因子纤维蛋白液 BIO-OSS骨粉 口腔种植引导性骨再生术 黏膜愈合 骨缺损再生 Rich self-concentrating growth factor fibrin solution Bio-Oss bone powder Oral implant-guided bone regeneration Mucosal healing Bone defect regeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1蔡潇潇,宫苹.生长因子联合引导性再生技术在口腔种植治疗中的应用[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2007,34(5):378-380. 被引量:7
  • 2Moghadam HG. Vertical and horizontal bone augmentation with the intraoral autogenous J-graft [J]. Implant Dent, 2009, 18(3): 230-238.
  • 3GuitaR, Baker RA, Bartolucci AA, et al. Barrier membranes used for ridge augmentation: is there an optimal pore size? [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(6): 1218-1225.
  • 4Torres J, Tamimi F, Alkhraisat MH, et al. Platelet-rich plasma may prevent titanium -mesh exposure in alveolar ridge augmentation with anorganie bovine bone [J]. J Clin Periodontal, 2010, 37(10): 943-951.
  • 5Zhang Y, Zhang X, Shi B, et al. Membranes for guided tissue and bone regeneration [J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 1(1):1-10.
  • 6Her S, Kang T, Fien MJ. Titanium mesh as an alternative to a membrane for ridge augmentation [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 70(4): 803-810.
  • 7Rakhmatia YD, Ayukawa ~, Furuhashi A, et al. Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications [J].J Prosthodont Res, 2013, 57(1):3-14.
  • 8Plachokova AS, Nikolidakis D, Mulder J, et al. Effect of platelet-rich plasma on bone regeneration in dentistry: a systematic review [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(6): 539- 545.
  • 9Sohn DS, Heo JU, Kwak DH, et al. Bone regeneration in the maxillary sinus using an autologous fibrin-rich block with concentrated growth factors alone [J].Implant Dent, 2011, 20(5): 389-395.
  • 10Man Y, Wang P, Guo Y, et al. Angiogenie and osteogenic potential of platelet-rich plasma and adipose-derived stem cell laden alginate mierospheres [J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33 (34): 8802-8811.

共引文献68

同被引文献141

引证文献15

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部