期刊文献+

基层胸痛中心建设效果评价及质控策略 被引量:2

Effectiveness evaluation and quality control strategy at primary-level chest pain centers
原文传递
导出
摘要 对2017年7月至2019年6月上海市嘉定区南翔医院通过胸痛中心数据填报平台实时抓取的胸痛救治患者在线上报数据进行研究分析。结果显示,首次医疗接触后完成心电图检查月平均时间1.3~6.9 min,中位1.9(1.7,2.2)min,符合10 min内完成的质控要求;获取肌钙蛋白检测结果所需时间13.0~48.4 min,中位14.1(13.4,18.1)min,符合质控20 min内完成的要求;从入门至转出经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的时间19.0~100.0 min,中位37.2(29.3,66.6)min,基本达到质控要求的30 min;ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进导管室率50.0%~100.0%,中位100.0%(73.3%,100.0%),符合质控≥50%的要求。胸痛中心经过积极建设主要质控指标管控良好,上报病例数基本稳定,病种分布基本合理。在转运知情告知和在低危胸痛患者后续处置上需进一步加强。提示胸痛中心建设要建立长效常态工作机制,要加强对重点质控指标的管控,胸痛中心建设要发挥区域救治体系作用。 The real-time reported data of treated patients from July 2017 to June 2019 Nanxiang Hospital of Jiading District were collected from chest pain center platform.The results showed that the average time of completing ECG examination from the first medical contact was 1.3 to 6.9 min with a median of 1.9 min(1.7,2.2),meeting the quality control requirements(10 min);the time required to obtain troponin test results was 13.0 to 48.4 min with a median of 14.1 min(13.4,18.1),meeting the requirements for quality control of 20 min;time from entry to transfer out of PCI patients was 19.0-100.0 min,with median 37.2(29.3,66.6)min,basically reaching quality control(30 min);the entering catheter chamber rate of STEMI patients was 50.0%to 100.0%with a median of 100.0%(73.3%,100.0%),meeting the requirements of quality control(≥50%).Through the active construction,the main quality control indicators were well reached,the reported cases were basically stable,and the disease distribution was basically reasonable in the primary-level chest pain centers.Informed notification of transshipment and subsequent management of low-risk chest pain patients need to be further strengthened.It is suggested that the construction of chest pain centers should establish long-term normal working mechanism,strengthening the control of key quality control indicators,to play the important role of the regional treatment system.
作者 周海龙 封卫征 厉海洋 金莉莎 钱丽静 朱晓玲 周艳丽 张晓影 Zhou Hailong;Feng Weizheng;Li Haiyang;Jin Lisha;Qian Lijing;Zhu Xiaoling;Zhou Yanli;Zhang Xiaoying(Nanxiang Hospital of Jiading District,Shanghai 201802,China)
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2020年第5期434-437,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
基金 上海市医院协会医院管理研究基金2018年协会级立项课题(201801042)。
关键词 胸痛中心 基层 效果评价 Chest pain center Primary level Effect evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献46

  • 1韩雅玲.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(6):37-40. 被引量:20
  • 2赵丹凝.浅谈我国发展管理式医疗的必要性[J].中国商界,2010(6):285-285. 被引量:3
  • 3方刚,杨波.美国的管理式医疗及思考[J].中国医院,2005,9(12):70-74. 被引量:11
  • 4冯国忠,朱亭郦.浅谈管理式医疗及其在中国的初步发展[J].中国卫生事业管理,2007,23(1):41-42. 被引量:6
  • 5Graft J, Dallara M, Ross A,et al. Impact on the care of the emergency department chest pain patient from the chest pain evaluation registry study[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 1997,80(34): 563-568.
  • 6Gibler WB,Runyon JP, Levy RC, et al. A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergency department[J]. Ann Emerg, 1995(25): 381-388.
  • 7Raymond DB. Chest pain centers:moving toward proactive acute coronary care [J]. International Journal of Cardiology, 2000, 72(2): 101-110.
  • 8Zalenski R J, Grzybowski M. The chest pain center in the emergency department [J]. Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2001,19(2) :469-481.
  • 9Mufioz D, Roettig ML, Monk L, et al. Transport time and care processes for patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the reper- fusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina emergency rooms experience [J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2012,5(4) :555-562.
  • 10Chamnarnphol N, Wisaratapong T, Cheevatanakornkul S. Correlation between percutaneous coronary intervention volume, door-to-balloon time and mortality of patients with acJte ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2012,95(3) :325-329.

共引文献160

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部