期刊文献+

汉化RAC风险评估模型在CABG患者中的应用价值

Application value of RAC model in predicting readmission after coronary artery bypass graft
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:引进并汉化RAC风险评估模型,检验其区分度和校准度,探索其在中国人群中的适用度,以提供中国冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者术后再入院风险有效评价的工具。方法:对源模型进行翻译汉化,收集2017年在武汉市亚洲心脏病医院接受CABG手术的患者825例,获取病历,根据汉化模型对患者进行评分,根据评分结果用ROC曲线检验其区分度,用H-L检验其校准度。结果:汉化RAC风险预测模型在中国CABG患者中应用价值较高(ROC曲线下面积0.714[95%CI(0.640,0.788)],H-L检验:P=0.823)。结论:汉化RAC风险预测模型可用于临床工作中CABG患者再入院风险的预测。 Objective:We introduce the Sinicized RAC risk prediction model to test its discrimination and calibration,and explore its applicability in Chinese population,then provide an effective tool for evaluating the risk of readmission in Chinese patients with CABG.Method:The source model was translated into Chinese.The 825patients undergoing CABG operation in Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital in 2017were selected to obtain medical records.According to the Sinicized model,the patients were scored.Their discrimination was tested by ROC curve,and their calibration was tested by H-L.Result:The value of Chinese RAC risk prediction model was high in Chinese CABG patients.(The area under ROC curve was 0.714[95%CI(0.640,0.788)],H-L test:P=0.823).Conclusion:The Chinese RAC risk prediction model can be used to predict the risk of readmission of CABG patients.
作者 刘国帧 张迎红 吕跳 肖欢 张文 胡柳 刘颖 LIU Guozhen;ZHANG Yinghong;LV Tiao;XIAO Huan;ZHANG Wen;HU Liu;LIU Ying(Medical College,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,430065;Department of Cardiac Surgery,Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital)
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第4期326-329,共4页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
基金 湖北省卫生计生科研项目(No:WJ2015Z060) 武汉科技大学大学生创新项目(No:18ZRA178)。
关键词 冠状动脉旁路移植术 再入院 汉化风险评估模型 ROC曲线 coronary artery bypass grafting readmission Chinese risk prediction model ROC curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1郭继鸿.深入认识心脏再同步化治疗心力衰竭的机制[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2006,20(4):283-284. 被引量:62
  • 2MANOCCHIA M. SF-36 Health Survey Annotated Bibliography[M]. 2nd ed (1998 ~1996 ). Boston: New England Medical Center, 1998 : 222-- 235.
  • 3SPERTUS J A, WINDER J A, DEWHURSTT A, et al. Development and evaluation of the seattle Angina Questionnaire:a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1995, 26:333--341.
  • 4HERLITZ J, BRANDRUP-WOGNSEN G, CAIDAHL K, et al. Improvement and factors associated with improvement in quality of life during 10 years after coronary artery bypass grafting[J].Coron Artery Dis,2003,14:509--517.
  • 5NAJAFI M, SHEIKHVATAN M, MONTAZERI A. Quality of life-associated factors among patients undergo- ing coronary artery bypass surgery as measured using the WHOQOL-BREF[J]. Cardiovasc J Afr, 2009,20 : 284-- 289.
  • 6DEUSE T, DETTER C, SAMUEL V, et al. Early and midterm results after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: which patient population benefits the most? [J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2003,6 : 77 - 83.
  • 7IMMER F F, BERDAT P A, IMMER-BANSI A S, et al. Benefit to quality of life after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2003,76:27--31.
  • 8ANGELINI G D, CULLIFORD L, SMITH D K, et al. Effects of on- and off-pump coronary artery sur- gery on graft patency, survival, and health-related quality of life: long-term follow-up of 2 randomized controlled trials[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2009, 137:295-303.
  • 9NOGUEIRA C R, HUEB W, TAKIUTI M E, et al. Quality of life after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery[J]. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2008,91:217--222,238--244.
  • 10KHOUEIRY G, FLORY M, ABI RAFEH N, et al. Depression, disability, and quality of life after off- pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective 9-month follow-up study[J]. Heart Lung, 2011,40: 217-225.

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部