期刊文献+

休克指数年龄休克指数对急性肺栓塞预后的评估价值 被引量:12

Shock index and age-based shock index in evaluating the prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评估休克指数(shock index,SI)和年龄休克指数(age-based shock index,SIA)对急性肺栓塞患者的预后价值.方法 回顾性分析2014年1月至2018年12月在自贡市第四人民医院诊断为急性肺栓塞患者SI、SIA、肺栓塞严重指数(pulmonary embolism severity index,PESI),以发病6个月生存情况为终点指标,Kaplan-Meier生存分析法比较不同分组的SI、SIA生存曲线,单因素COX回归法确定SI、SIA是否为预测急性肺栓塞预后的独立危险因素,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC),比较SI、SIA与PESI的预测价值.结果 急性肺栓塞患者283例,男性168例,女性115例,平均年龄(68.40±13.25)岁,存活234例(82.7%),死亡49例(17.3%).死亡组患者SI值[0.82(0.65,0.98)]及SIA值[55.82(45.61,70.97)]较存活组SI值[0.72(0.60,0.86)]及SIA值[49.22 (37.90,57.81)]更大.SI≤0.89组与SI >0.89组比较6个月生存率差异有统计学意义(P=0.000),SIA≤54.28组与SIA>54.28组比较6个月生存率差异有统计学意义(P =0.000).单因素COX回归分析,SI(β=0.992, SE=0.372, Wald=7.127,P=0.008)、SIA(β =0.014,SE =0.004,Wald =9.801 ,P =0.002)是预测6个月生存率的独立危险因素.SI预测6个月生存率曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)0.615,SIA的AUC值0.658,PESI的AUC值为0.773,PESI的AUC值高于SI及SIA(P <0.05).结论 SI、SIA在急性肺栓塞的预后判断中均具有临床应用价值,但目前预测价值低于PESI. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of shock index(SI)and age-based shock index(SIA)in the patients with acute pulmonary embolism(PE).Methods The patients with acute pulmonary embolism diagnosed in Zigong Fourth People’s Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively.SI,SIA and pulmonary embolism severity index(PESI)were calculated.The survival curves of SI and SIA in different groups were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.Univariate COX regression was used to determine whether SI and SIA were independent risk factors for predicting the prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism.The predictive value of SI,SIA and PESI was compared by drawing the receiver operating characteristic curve.Results From January 2014 to December 2018,283 patients with acute pulmonary embolism[man 168,female 115,mean age(68.40±13.25)years]234(82.7%)survived and 49(17.3%)died in Zigong Fourth People’s Hospital.The SI value[0.82(0.65,0.98)]and SIA value[55.82(45.61,70.97)]in the dead group were higher than those in the survival group[0.72(0.60,0.86)]and[49.22(37.90,57.81)].There was significant difference in 6-month survival rate between SI≤0.89 and SI>0.89(P=0.000).There was significant difference in 6-month survival rate between SIA≤54.28 and SIA>54.28(P=0.000).Univariate COX regression analysis showed that SI(β=0.992,SE=0.372,Wald=7.127,P=0.008)and SIA(β=0.014,SE=0.004,Wald=9.801,P=0.002)were independent risk factors for 6-month survival.The area under ROC of SI was 0.615,the area under ROC of SIA was 0.658,and the area under ROC of PESI was 0.773.The area under ROC of PESI was higher than that of SI and SIA(P<0.05).Conclusion Both SI and SIA have clinical value in predicting the prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism,yet their predictive value is lower than that of PESI.
作者 黄文彬 王榆舒 徐平 曹灵红 刘伟 王波 Huang Wen-bin;Wang Yu-shu;Xu Ping;Cao Ling-hong;Liu Wei;Wang Bo(Department of Emergency,Zigong Fourth People's Hospital,Zigong 643000,China)
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期49-53,共5页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
基金 2018年自贡市重点计划项目(2018CZ10) 2019年成都中医药大学杏林学者学科人才科研提升计划(YYZX2019045)。
关键词 肺栓塞(PE) 休克指数(SI) 年龄休克指数(SIA) 预后 Pulmonary embolism(PE) Shock index(SI) Age-based shock index(SIA) Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献90

  • 1胡大一,张鹤萍,孙艺红,姜立清.华法林与阿司匹林预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者血栓栓塞的随机对照研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(4):295-298. 被引量:162
  • 2邹治鹏,何建国,程显声,赵彦芬,陈白屏,高莹,熊长明,倪新海,荆志诚.230例急性肺动脉血栓栓塞症患者对症治疗、抗凝治疗和溶栓治疗的住院转归[J].中国循环杂志,2006,21(3):219-221. 被引量:27
  • 3Sutton R M,Donoghue A,Myklebust H,et al.The voice advisory manikin(VAM):an innovative approach to pediatric lay provider basic life support skill education[J].Resuscitation,2007,75:161-168.
  • 4Oermann M H,Kardong-Edgren S E,McColgan J K,et al.Advantages and barriers to use of HeartCode BLS with voice advisory manikins for teaching nursing students[J].Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh,2010,1:26-27.
  • 5WolfeTR, AllenTL. Syncope as an emergency department presentation of pulmonary embolism[J]. J Emerg Med, 16(1):27–31.
  • 6KonstantinidesSV. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism[J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35(45): 3145–3146. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu393.
  • 7HeitJA. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2008,28(3):370–372.DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.162545.
  • 8CohenAT, AgnelliG, AndersonFA, et al. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2007,98(4):756–764.
  • 9YangY, LiangL, ZhaiZ, et al. Pulmonary embolism incidence and fatality trends in chinese hospitals from 1997 to 2008: a multicenter registration study[J]. PLoS One, 2011,6(11):e26861.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026861.
  • 10LaporteS, MismettiP, DécoususH, et al. Clinical predictors for fatal pulmonary embolism in 15,520 patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) Registry[J]. Circulation, 2008,117(13):1711–1716.DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.726232.

共引文献649

同被引文献94

引证文献12

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部