期刊文献+

被胁迫行为的刑法适用路径

Application of Criminal Law to Coerced Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法实践对被胁迫行为的认定仅仅局限于胁从犯理论,这是对被胁迫行为的内涵在理解范围上的缩小和局限。我国刑法中的被胁迫行为既包括阻却犯罪的被胁迫行为,也包括影响量刑的被胁迫行为。被胁迫行为应当包含三种类型:第一种是受到绝对强制无法做出自由选择的被胁迫行为,应当适用我国《刑法》关于"不可抗力"的规定;第二种是受到相对强制能够做出选择但不负刑事责任的被胁迫行为,应当适用我国《刑法》关于"紧急避险"的规定;第三种是成立故意犯罪和避险过当的被胁迫行为,应当适用我国《刑法》关于"胁从犯"的规定。 Judicial practice's determination of coerced behavior is limited to the theory of coercion,which is a reduction in the scope of understanding of the content of coerced behavior.The coerced behaviors in China's criminal law include both coerced behaviors that prevent crimes and coerced behaviors that affect sentencing.There are three types of acts of coercion:First,those who are absolutely forced to make a free choice should be subject to the"force majeure"provisions of China's criminal law;Second,they can make a choice but are not criminally liable under relative coercion responsibility for intimidation should apply the provisions of our criminal law on"emergency avoidance";Third,the establishment of intentional crimes and excessive risk aversion should be subject to our criminal law's"complicity.
作者 蔡可睿 CAI Kerui(School of Lazu,East China University of Political Science and Law,Wenzhou 325000,China)
出处 《商丘职业技术学院学报》 2020年第2期12-17,共6页 JOURNAL OF SHANGQIU POLYTECHNIC
关键词 被胁迫行为 不可抗力 紧急避险 胁从犯 coerced behavior force majeure emergency avoidance complicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1李立众.略论被迫行为及其借鉴意义[J].政法论丛,1999(5):25-27. 被引量:11
  • 2[美]道格拉斯·N·胡萨克著.《刑法哲学》.谢望原等译,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年版,第16页.
  • 3[俄]Н·Ф·库兹涅佐娃,Й·М·佳日科娃主编.《俄罗斯刑法教程(总论)》(上卷·犯罪论).黄道秀译.中国法制出版社,2002年版,第475页.
  • 4See Joshua Dressier, Understanding Criminal Law, Second Edition, Matthew Bender & CO. , INC. pp. 278 - 279. (1995).
  • 5See Sanford H. Kadish, Criminal Law and Its Processes Cases and Materials, Sixth Edition, Little Brown and Company, pp. 904. (1995).
  • 6See LaFave& Scott, Criminal Law, West, 2d ed, at 432 -433. (1986).
  • 7See Peter Western + James Mangiaflco, The Criminal Defense of Duress: A lustification, Not an Excuse - And Why It Matters, 6 Buff. Crim. L. R. 834. (2003).
  • 8See Dan M. Kahan, and Martha C. Nussbaum, Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law, 96 Colum. L Rev. 269, 336. (1996).
  • 9Peter Western & James Mangiafico, The Criminal Defense of Duress: A Justification, Not an Excuse - And Why It Matters, 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 859, (2003).
  • 10高金桂著.《利益衡量与刑法之犯罪判断》.台湾元照出版公司,2000年版.第151页.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部