科研不端定义的国际比较研究:表现形式与界定方式

International Comparative Study on the Definitions of Research Misconduct:The Manifestations and Boundaries

为了推进对科研不端行为的理解,文章基于10个代表性国家的科研不端政策,探讨了科研不端行为的表现形式与界定方式。研究指出,科研不端行为的表现形式可根据不端行为与知识生产的关系分为两类,而科研不端行为的界定方式则可分为窄定义、宽定义和开放定义三类。美国的FFP定义在国际上不具有广泛性,而中国的开放定义也并非孤案。最后,文章就如何完善中国的科研不端政策,提出了几点启示。

In order to promote the understanding of the definition of research misconduct,the research misconduct policies from 10 representative countries are selected to discuss the manifestations and definitions of research misconduct.The manifestations of research misconduct can be divided into two categories and the definition of scientific misconduct can be divided into three categories.Then the paper points out that the definition of FFP in the United States is not universal in the international arena,and the open definition of scientific misconduct in China is not an isolated case.Finally,some enlightenment are put forward to improve China’s research misconduct policy.