摘要
文章使用机制复合体来描述双边、区域和全球金融治理机制的组合。机制复合体可能会导致全球金融治理机制的碎片化,带来治理机制转移、出现“选择法院”以及对规则选择性的执行和解释,并在各治理机制之间造成低效竞争;机制复合体也可能提供了加强合作和提高效率的机会,个体机制通过机制间学习、说服和信息交流等互动过程促进了合作。考虑到机制复合体中多层治理机制之间核心规范的差异性与个体机制的策略选择两个维度,以及两者之间的相互作用对国际金融治理机制有效性的影响,文章提出了机制复合体的四种类型:良性协同、功能性竞争、建设性合作和恶性破坏,并通过案例说明不同类型的治理机制重叠的后果。案例分析表明,不同领域的金融治理机制间相互作用的范围、性质、层级等要素存在很大差异,其演进规律也不相同。尽管我们希望合理化和简化日益复杂的国际金融架构,但金融机制复合体中的多层安排具有战略和政治动机,因而加强全球安排和治理机制的努力,不太可能扭转金融治理多边化和区域化的趋势。因此,推动机制复合体内各个体机制的协调,并促使其朝着减少分歧、增加互动的方向发展,是提高机制复合体治理有效性的关键。
This paper uses regime complex to describe bilateral,regional and global configurations of finance governance.Taking into account the differences of core norms and the strategic choice of individual mechanisms,as well as the influence of their interaction on the effectiveness of international financial architecture governance,the paper proposes the taxonomy which defines four types of regime complex:virtuous synergistic,functional competition,constructive cooperation and disruptive destruction.This paper illustrates the consequences of the overlapping of different types of governance mechanisms through case studies,which show that there are great differences in the scope,nature,and level of the interaction between financial architecture governance,and so are their evolution paths.The multi-level arrangement in the financial regime complex has strategic and political motivation,so it is unlikely to prevent the trend of multilateral and regional financial governance by strengthening the efforts of global arrangement and governance.
作者
张中元
Zhang Zhongyuan(the National Institute of International Strategy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)
出处
《当代亚太》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期119-140,168,共23页
Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
关键词
金融体系
机制复合体
核心规范
策略选择
国际金融治理
Financial Architecture
Regime Complex
Core Norms
Strategy Choice
International Financial Governance