期刊文献+

婴儿尊严死的法律问题研究--以Charlie Gard案为切入 被引量:1

On the Legal Issues of Death with Dignity for Infants:Taking the Case of Charlie Gard as a Starting Point
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在某些重症场合,延长生命长度并非医疗决策的唯一决定因素,生命质量的考量也已被国内外司法实践所认可。生命质量说为婴儿尊严死提供了前提条件,也即并非在任何情况下都必须维持重症婴儿的生命。对于重症婴儿生命质量的判断,由于其同时作为父母的子女和医生的患者,从家事法和医事法的双重角度,最佳利益原则都应当适用于此情况。但最佳利益原则具有不确定性,故必须在具体案件中考量各种相关因素。为便于此种考量,法律应归纳列举给予医疗措施将不符合婴儿的最佳利益的具体情形,同时法律还应建立婴儿尊严死的程序保障机制。 In certain cases of severe diseases,prolonging life length is not the only determinant of healthcare decision-making,and the consideration of quality of life has been recognized by judicial practice.The theory of quality of life provides a precondition for the infant to die with dignity,that is,it is not necessary to maintain the life of an infant with severe diseases under all circumstances.For the judgment of the quality of life of an infant with severe diseases,the principle of best interest should be applied to him/her from the perspective of family law and medical law since he/she is both his/her parent’s child and his/her doctor’s patient.However,the principle of the best interest is uncertain,so it is necessary to considerate the relevant factors in certain cases.In order to facilitate this consideration,the law should summarize and list the circumstances in which medical treatment would not be in the best interest of the infant.At the same time,the law should establish procedural safeguards mechanism for death with dignity for infants.
作者 孙也龙 SUN Ye-long(School of Law,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing 211816,China)
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2020年第3期83-96,共14页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 南京工业大学引进人才科研启动专项经费 教育人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“生前预嘱法律制度研究”。
关键词 婴儿尊严死 Charlie Gard案 生命质量 最佳利益原则 death with dignity for infants case of Charlie Gard quality of life principle of best interest
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献74

  • 1祝彬.论患者最佳利益原则[J].医学与哲学(A),2009,30(5):33-35. 被引量:21
  • 2上官丕亮.前社会主义国家现行宪法监督制度比较研究及其对我们的启示[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,17(z1):10-24. 被引量:4
  • 3许晓娟,彭志刚,黄河.论“知情同意”的若干法律问题[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,42(4):35-40. 被引量:3
  • 4徐显明.生存权论[J].中国社会科学,1992(5):39-56. 被引量:132
  • 5我国《侵权责任法》.
  • 6Jasper M. Hospital Liability Law [M]. New York:Oxford Universi ty Press, 2008:34.
  • 7Roach C. Paradox and Pandora' s Box: The Tragedy of Current Right--to Die Jurisprudence[J]. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform,1991,133:161 63.
  • 8Field M. Killing "The Handicapped" Before and After Birth [J]. Harvard Women' s Law Journal, 1993,79 : 3.
  • 9Medical Council. Guide to Ethical Conduct and Behavior[S/OL]. Dublin: Medical Council, 2009:2212011 09 26].http://www. medical council, ie/Professional-- Standards/Professional-- Conduct -- Ethics/The-- Guide-- to -- Professional-- Conduct-- and Ethics -- for-- Registered-- Medical-- Practitioners-- 7th-- Edition 2009 --. pdf.
  • 10Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminski M, et al. Neonatal End of Life De- cision Making: Physicians' Attitudes and Relationship with Self-- reported Practices in 10 European Countries[J]. Journal of the A- merican Medical Association, 2000,284 : 2451 -- 2459.

共引文献210

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部