“非破产加速”的合理性证成

On Rationality of "Non-bankruptcy Acceleration"

认缴制的确立使股东之期限利益名正言顺,但股东恶意约定过长出资期限现象频发,致债权人利益保护和股东出资自治权之间关系紧迫。理论界对于股东出资义务在必要情形下是否得以加速到期的问题莫衷一是,相关法律制度也难见明文,司法实践更是乱象横生。欲于债权人利益与股东之期限利益间寻得平衡,尚需以公司法、破产法及合同法之规范基础为理论支撑,以民法相关精神为指导,立足于《九民会议纪要》相关内容,找到证成"非加速到期"制度可平衡股东利益和债权人利益之依据,非破产情形下股东出资义务加速到期将具有可适用性。

The establishment of the subscription system makes the shareholders′term interests legitimate,but the phenomenon that the shareholders maliciously agree on an excessively long term of investment occurs frequently,causing a tense relationship between the protection of the interests of creditors and the autonomy of shareholders′investment.There is no agreement on whether the shareholder′s obligation of capital contribution can be accelerated to maturity when necessary,and the relevant legal system is rarely clear,and the judicial practice is even more chaotic.In order to find a balance between the interests of creditors and the interests of shareholders,it is necessary to take the normative basis of company law,bankruptcy law and contract law as the theoretical support,and utilize the relevant spirit of civil law as the guidance,and based on the relevant contents of The Minutes of the Ninth People′s Congress to find out the basis of proving that the system of"non-acceleration to the restricted period"can balance the interests of shareholders and creditors,so that in the case of non bankruptcy,the accelerated maturity of shareholders′contribution obligation will be applicable.