期刊文献+

论不可解读特征的问题及其取消的可能

On the Problems of Uninterpretable Features and Their Eliminability
原文传递
导出
摘要 不可解读特征([uF])是生成语法最简方案的核心理论构件之一,它的删除与它在接口的不可接受性在很大程度上定义了目前句法解释的形态:删除[uF]的要求驱动句法运算,[uF]的不可接受性构成接口条件的主要内容。然而,[uF]有违背强势最简性的嫌疑,与边际特征有矛盾之处,在句法解释上有专设性,同时与句法运算和句法表征发生冗余。这些都说明取消[uF]有一定的必要性。如果[uF]被取消,这就意味着最简方案目前的框架需要重大修正。 Uninterpretable features( [uF ]) constitute one of the core theoretical constructs of the Minimalist Program. In a sense,their deletion and their unacceptability at the interfaces largely determine the minimalist account for syntactic phenomena: the need of their deletion drives syntactic computation,and their unacceptability serves as a major part of interface conditions. However, the concept of [uF ] is a violation of the Strong Minimalist Thesis( SMT),contradicting the concept of Edge Feature( EF),and the explanation it provides is largely ad hoc and redundant with that provided by syntactic operations and representations. All these considerations point to the desideratum of eliminating [uF ],which amounts to a fundamental change in the overall architecture of the Minimalist Program.
作者 徐浩 XU Hao
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期1-9,160,共10页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献38

  • 1李梅,赵婵.话题之功能短语分析[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(4):248-254. 被引量:8
  • 2潘海华,韩景泉.显性非宾格动词结构的句法研究[J].语言研究,2005,25(3):1-13. 被引量:137
  • 3徐烈炯.话题句的合格条件[A].徐烈炯,刘丹青.话题与焦点新论[C].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.131—144.
  • 4Alrenga, P. 2005. A sentential subject asymmetry in English and its implications for complement selection [J]. Syntax 8: 175-207.
  • 5Authier, J. M. 1992. Iterated CPs and embedded topicalization [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 329-336.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 1995 The-Minimali-st Program [M]. Cambridge, MA. : M1T Press.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework EA]. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.). Step by Step : Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik [C]. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, 89-155.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase [A]. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language [C]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-52.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy [A]. In A. Belletti (ed.). Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3 [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104-131.
  • 10Chomsky, N. 2008. On phases IA]. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.). Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud [C]. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, 133-166.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部