期刊文献+

职场不文明行为对旁观者工作有效性的影响:道义公平的视角 被引量:4

The Impact of Workplace Incivility on Observers’Job Effectiveness:From the Perspective of Deontic Justice
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于道义公平理论探讨了职场不文明行为对旁观者工作有效性的影响。基于157份领导-下属配对样本,研究表明,职场不文明行为对旁观者工作有效性的过程(创造力)和结果(工作绩效)均有显著的负向影响;道义公平在职场不文明行为与旁观者工作有效性的关系中发挥中介作用,公正世界信念调节职场不文明行为对旁观者道义公平的作用,以及道义公平在职场不文明行为与旁观者工作有效性关系中的间接效应。本研究基于旁观者视角考察了职场不文明行为的影响,丰富了职场不文明行为的研究文献,对组织抑制职场不文明行为的消极作用也有一定的价值。 From the perspective of deontic justice,this paper investigates the impact of workplace incivility on observers’job effectiveness.Based on a two-stage paired data from 157 employee-supervisor dyads,it is found that workplace incivility has a significant negative effect on the process(creativity)and outcome(work performance)of observers’job effectiveness;deontic justice mediates the effect of workplace incivility on observers’job effectiveness(including creativity and job performance);belief in a just work not only moderates the effect of workplace incivility on observers’job effectiveness,but also moderates the mediation mechanism of deontic justice.This study explores the effect of workplace incivility form observers’perspective,enriches the literature on workplace incivility,which has much value for organizations to restrain workplace incivility and its negative effects.
作者 李志成 喻玲 Li Zhicheng;Yu Ling(School of Tourism and Urban Management,Jiangxi University of Finance&Economics,Nanchang 330013;School of Law,Jiangxi University of Finance&Economics,Nanchang 330013)
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期232-243,共12页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71662013) 江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ180280,GJJ170330) 江西省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(JD18100) 江西省自然科学基金项目(2018BAA208040)。
关键词 职场不文明行为 道义公平 公正世界信念 工作有效性 workplace incivility deontic justice belief in a just world job effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1Tepper B. J.. Consequences of Abusive Supervision[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(2): 178-190.
  • 2Mackey J. D., Frieder R. E., Brees J. R., Martinko M. J.. Abusive Supervision: A Meta-Analysis and Empirical Re- view[J], Journal of Management, 2015, 3(10): 64-69.
  • 3Martinko M. J., Harvey P., Brees J. R.. A Review of Abusive Supervision Research[J]. Journal of Organizational Be- havior, 2013, 34(1): 120-137.
  • 4Thau S,, Bennett R. J., Mitchell M. S.. How Management Style Moderates the Relationship between Abusive Supervi- sion and Workplace Deviance: An Uncertainty Management Theory Perspective[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci- sion Processes, 2009, 108(1): 79-92.
  • 5Poon K., Chen Z.. When Justice Surrenders: The Effect of Just-world Beliefs on Aggression Following Ostracism[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2014, 52(6): 101-112.
  • 6Mayer D. M., Than S., Workman K. M., et al.. Leader Mistreatment, Employee Hostility, and Deviant Behaviors: Inte- grating Self-uncertainty and Thwarted Needs Perspectives on Deviance[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Pro- cesses, 2012, 117(1): 24-40.
  • 7Lerner M. J., Miller D. T.. Just World Research and the Attribution Process: Looking Back and Ahead[J]. Psychologi- cal Bulletin, 1978, 85(5): 1030-1051.
  • 8Dalbert C.. Belief in a Just World as a Buffer Against Anger[J]. Social Justice Research, 2002, 15(2): 123-144.
  • 9Brief A. P., Weiss H. M.. Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002, 53 (8): 279-307.
  • 10Hafer C. L., Begue L.. Experimental Research on Just-world Theory: Problems, Developments, and Future Challenges [J]. Psychology Bulletin, 2005, 131(1): 128-167.

共引文献12

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部