期刊文献+

基于EVA模型的物流企业价值研究 被引量:5

Study on the Value of Logistics Enterprises Based on EVA Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,物流行业作为当今社会服务业的基础组成部分,与大众生活息息相关,自身也正处于鼎盛时期,发展日新月异。但现阶段的物流企业发展一味地寻求规模效益,忽视了对于物流效率的提升和综合服务水平的加强以及运输费用的降低。因此,对物流企业价值进行准确评价非常重要。顺丰控股股份有限公司作为我国上市物流企业中的龙头企业,在行业内具有极强的竞争力,其财务数据兼有快递行业的行业共性和自身特点,具有较强的研究价值。文章在分析评价物流企业价值的方法上选择了EVA,据此分析物流企业的财务状况,给投资者的投资决策提供一定程度上的帮助。 At present,the logistics industry,as the basic component of the social service industry,is closely related to the public life.But at present,the logistics enterprises seek the scale benefit blindly,ignoring the improvement of logistics efficiency,the enhancement of comprehensive service level and the reduction of transportation cost.Therefore,it is very important to evaluate the value of logistics enterprises accurately.As a leading company in the listed logistics enterprises in China,SF Holding Co.,Ltd,has strong competitiveness in the industry.Its financial data has both the characteristics of the express industry and its own characteristics,and has strong research value.In this paper,EVA is chosen as the method to evaluate the value of logistics enterprises,according to which the financial status of logistics enterprises is analyzed.
作者 姚霞波 YAO Xiabo(School of Management,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing 210003,China)
出处 《物流科技》 2020年第7期162-166,共5页 Logistics Sci-Tech
关键词 物流企业 顺丰控股 EVA模型 企业价值 logistics enterprise SF Holding EVA model enterprise value
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献53

  • 1耿建新,徐港章,张好.市盈率与市净率之间的关系辨析——以沪市新股发行为例[J].审计与经济研究,2013,28(1):53-59. 被引量:9
  • 2周清杰.演化经济学企业理论的基本逻辑与分析框架[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(4):9-14. 被引量:12
  • 3Burns, J. , and R. W. Scapens. 2000. Conceptualizing Management Accounting Change: An Institutional Framework. Man- agement Accounting Research, 11 ( 1 ) : 3 ~ 25.
  • 4Chenhall, R. H. 2003. Management Control Systems Design within Its Organizational Context: Findings from Contingency - based Research and Directions for the Future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28 (2 -3) : 127 ~ 168.
  • 5Child, J. , L. Chung,, and H. , Davis. 2003. The Performance of Cross - border Units in China: A Test of Natural Selec- tion, Strategic Choice and Contingency Theories.
  • 6Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (3) : 242 ~ 254.
  • 7Du, F., G. Tang, and M. Young. 2012. Influence Activities and Favoritism in Subjective Performance evaluation: Evi- dence from Chinese State- owned Enterprises. The Accounting Review, 87 (5) : 1555 ~ 1588.
  • 8Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532 - 550.
  • 9Eisenhardt, K. M. 1991. Better Stories and Better Constructs: Management Review, 16 (3) : 620 ~627.
  • 10Gerdin, J. , and J. Greve. 2004. Forms of Contingency Fit in Management Accounting Research--A Critical Review. Ac- counting, Organizations and Society, 29 ( 3 - 4) : 303 - 326.

共引文献107

同被引文献19

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部