陆秀夫谪迁潮州说献疑

Arguments Against the Viewpoint of Lu Xiufu’s Exile to Chaozhou

陆秀夫谪迁潮州一事,因有传世文献、民间传说及实物遗存等的多重佐证,似乎已成学界共识。事实上,这些证据要么语焉不详,要么矛盾重重。通过对相关文献资料的梳理研究,可知陆秀夫很可能只是名义上谪潮,实际则一直随行朝活动,且相关处分很快即撤销。

Lu Xiufu’s exile to Chaozhou seems to have become an academic consensus,which is supported by multiple sources of evidence including documents handed down from ancient times,folklore and physical remains.In fact,such evidence is either vague or contradictory.Through a re⁃view of the relevant documents,it can be seen that Lu Xiufu’s exile to Chaozhou was possibly car⁃ried out in name only,while he was actually engaged in state affairs all along,and the relevant pun⁃ishment was soon revoked.