关于《玉君》出版发行情况的再讨论

A Re-discussion on the Publication of Yu Jun

在历来的《玉君》研究中,有关作品出版发行及版本演变的表述有不实之处,龚明德的《累遭误解的〈玉君〉》一文做出了校勘考辨,但仍有需纠正和商榷之处。其中,龚文称《玉君》第三版仍由现代社出版印行,但其出版者实为朴社所设之景山书社;龚文认为《玉君》在1933年后的新文学时段不再重印与鲁迅对《玉君》的贬抑大有关联,这一释说夸大了鲁迅批评的话语影响力,而忽视了作品本身的时代局限及其对读书市场的适应性问题;龚文认为鲁迅的“傀儡说”主要是想沉重打击“陈西滢之流”与“周启明之流”,但在检讨其中所掺杂的人事因素的同时,还应从文艺观与话语特征出发来考虑鲁迅的话语缘由。

For a long time,there have been lots of mistakes in the research of the publication and edition of Yu Jun.Mr.Gong Mingde corrected many of them by the textual research and collation in his article“Much Misunderstood on Yu Jun”.However,there are still some problems to be corrected and discussed in his article.Firstly,Mr.Gong said that the third edition of Yu Jun was still published by The Contemporary Review School,but its publisher was actually Jing Shan Publishing House.Secondly,Mr.Gong believed that there was a close relationship between the fact that Yu Jun was no longer reprinted in the new literary period after 1933 and Lu Xun’s strong criticism of this work.This view obviously exaggerated the discourse influence of Lu Xun’s criticism,and ignored the limitations of the work itself and its adaptability to the reading market.Thirdly,Mr.Gong thought that the purpose of Lu Xun’s criticism of Yu Jun was to criticize Chen Xiying and Zhou Zuoren.However,besides reviewing the human factors involved,he should also consider the reason of Lu Xun’s criticism from the perspective of literary view and discourse characteristics.