期刊文献+

用户参与量表运用于探索式搜索效果评价的适用性探讨 被引量:5

Applicability of User Engagement Scale in Exploratory Search Effectiveness Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]探究用户参与度和探索式搜索效果之间的关系,验证用户参与量表(UES)用以评价探索式搜索效果的适用性,能够为探索式搜索效果评价提供新的思路,同时为指导用户搜索行为及搜索引擎的性能优化提供参考。[方法/过程]改进了适用于探索式搜索的用户参与量表,构建了多维探索式搜索效果评价指标体系,综合利用实验和问卷调查获取用户探索式搜索行为数据,通过SPSS数据分析揭示探索式搜索过程中用户参与度及其搜索效果之间的相关性。[结果/结论]除参与感以外的其他UES属性均对至少一个维度的探索式搜索效果有不同程度的显著正向影响,其中专注力影响最大,接下来依次是实用性、新颖性、易用性。可以认为,用户在探索式搜索过程中的参与度越高,搜索效果越好。用户参与量表运用于探索式搜索效果评价的适用性得以验证。 [Purpose/significance]Exploring the relationship between user engagement and exploratory search effectiveness,and verifying the applicability of User Engagement Scale(UES)in exploratory search effectiveness evaluation will not only provide new ideas for exploratory search effectiveness evaluation,but also provide reference in guiding users’search behavior and the performance optimization of search engine.[Method/process]This paper adapts the User Engagement Scale to exploratory search,and constructs a multi-dimensional exploratory search effectiveness evaluation index system.Users’search behavior data are obtained by means of experiment and questionnaire.SPSS data analysis reveals the correlation between user engagement and search effectiveness during exploratory search.[Result/conclusion]All UES attributes,excepts the sense of engagement,have significant positive effects on search effectiveness on at least one dimension in varying degrees.Focused attention has the greatest impact,followed by practicability,novelty and ease of use.It can be safely concluded that the more one is engaged in exploratory search,the higher the search efficiency is.Thus,the applicability of UES in exploratory search effectiveness evaluation was verified.
作者 袁红 周浩 Yuan Hong
出处 《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期109-114,共6页 Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目“用户探索式搜索行为的意图—策略关联模式研究”的成果之一,项目编号:17BTQ087。
关键词 用户参与量表 探索式搜索 搜索效果 用户满意度 成本收益比 查准率 user engagement scale exploratory search search effectiveness user satisfaction cost-benefit ratio precision
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献74

  • 1何克抗.建构主义——革新传统教学的理论基础(一)[J].教育学报,1998(3):29-31. 被引量:648
  • 2永刚.概念图作为教学评价工具的发展[J].学科教育,2004(7):43-46. 被引量:32
  • 3吴明隆.结构方程模型:Amos的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:212-262.
  • 4Bates M J. The design of browsing and berrypicking: Techniques for the online search interface [ J ]. Online Review, 1989,13 (5) : 407 - 424.
  • 5Bates M J. What is browsing - really? A model drawing from be- havioural science research [ J ]. Information Research, 2007,12 (4) :330.
  • 6Kuhlthau C C. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the use' s perspective[ J]. Journal of the American Society for In- formation Science, 1991,42 (5) :361 - 371.
  • 7Pirolli P, Card S. Information foraging in information access envi- ronments[C]// Katz I R, Mack R,eds. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York:ACM Press, 1995:51 -58.
  • 8Pirolli P, Card S. Information foraging [ J ]. Psychology Review, 1999,106(4) :643 -675.
  • 9Dervin B. From the mind' s eye of the user : The sense - making qualitative - quantitative methodology [ M ]//Glazier J D, Powell R R. Qualitative Research in Information Management, Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, 1992:64 - 81.
  • 10Dervin, B. Sense - making theory and practice : An overview of us- er interests in knowledge seeking and use [ J ]. Journal of Knowl- edge Management, 1998,2 (2) :36 - 46.

共引文献78

同被引文献58

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部