期刊文献+

心力衰竭与跌倒风险相关性的meta分析及系统评价 被引量:2

Meta analysis and systematic evaluation of the correlation between heart failure and the risk of falls
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价心力衰竭疾病与跌倒风险的关系。方法计算机检索PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,EMbase,以及中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)和万方数据库中有关心力衰竭与跌倒风险相关性的中英文横断面研究、队列研究和病例对照研究,检索日期均为建库至2019年1月。两名研究者单独提取资料并进行文献质量评价。结果共纳入6篇研究,154269例患者中心力衰竭4840例。meta分析结果显示,心力衰竭是跌倒的危险因素,OR=1.55,95%CI(1.20-1.99)。描述性分析结果显示,心力衰竭患者发生一次跌倒和反复跌倒的风险均高于研究中的其他亚组。结论患有心力衰竭疾病会增加跌倒的风险。 Objective To evaluate systematically the relationship between heart failure diseases and the risk of falls.Methods The computer search of PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,EMbase,and CBM,CNKI,and Wanfang databases on Chinese and English cross-sectional studies,cohort studies,and case-control studies on the correlation between heart failure and fall risk was performed,and the search dates were all from the establishment of the database to January 2019.The two researchers independently extracted data and conducted evaluation of literature quality.Results A total of 6 studies were included,and in 154,269 patients,there were 4,840 patients with heart failure.The results of the meta analysis showed that heart failure was the risk factor for falls,OR=1.55,95%CI(1.20-1.99).The results of the descriptive analysis showed that patients with heart failure had a higher risk of single and repeated falls than other subgroups in the study.Conclusion The heart failure disease increased the risk of falling.
作者 杜菲菲 张彩云 李娜 申冬琴 张志刚 韦性丽 DU Fei-fei;ZHANG Cai-yun;LI Na;SHEN Dong-qin;ZHANG Zhi-gang;WEI Xing-li
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2020年第12期1-5,共5页 Nursing Practice and Research
关键词 心力衰竭 跌倒 META分析 系统评价 Heart failure Fall Meta analysis Systematic evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1刘素珍,李继平,成翼娟,毛爱妹,胡秀英,石垣和子,铃木隆雄,上野真理.社区老年人身体机能状态及跌倒的相关因素分析[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2004,19(6):5-7. 被引量:26
  • 2诸葛毅,俎德玲,王小同,吴彬.卫生部指南量表测试老年人跌倒风险[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(1):188-190. 被引量:35
  • 3Grimes DA,Schulz KF.An overview of clinical research:the lay of the land[J].Lancet,2002,359(9300):57-61.
  • 4Egger M,Smith GD,Altman DG.Systematic reviews in health care.Meta-analysis in context[M].2nd ed.London:BMJ Publishing Group,BMA House,Tavistock Square,WC1H 9JR,2001.
  • 5Stang A.Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses[J].Eur J Epidemiol,2010,25(9):603-5.
  • 6Wells GA,Shea B,O'Connell D,et al.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm.
  • 7Wells G,Shea B,O'Connell D,et al.NewCastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale --Cohort Studies[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http:// www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  • 8Wells G,Shea B,O'Connell D,et al.NewCastle–Ottawa Quallty Assessment Scale--Case Control Studies[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  • 9Ibbotson T,Grimshaw J,Grant A.Evaluation of a programme of workshops for promoting the teaching of critical appraisal skills[J].Med Educ,1998,32(5):486-91.
  • 10CASP(Critical Skills Appraisal Programme)[EB/OL].[2012-06-15].http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP_Cohort_Appraisal_Checklist_14oct10.pdf.

共引文献1021

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部