期刊文献+

全麻术后苏醒期患者躁动高危因素调查及其护理干预 被引量:9

Investigation on the high-risk factors of patients'restlessness during the recovery period after general anesthesia and its nursing intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨全麻术后苏醒期患者躁动的高危因素,由此引起护理人员的高度重视,以防止意外事故的发生。方法采用便利抽样法,选择2017年8月至2019年8月我院收治的全麻术后患者194例作为研究对象,收集患者的相关资料与数据,采用多因素logistic回归分析,确定影响全麻术后苏醒期患者躁动的高危因素。结果194例全麻术后患者中发生苏醒期躁动35例(18.04%)。男性、术后未镇痛、留置导尿管、药物催眠、不同手术类型是影响全麻术后苏醒期患者躁动的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论导致全麻术后苏醒期患者躁动高危因素较多,护理人要高度重视,加强预防,杜绝或降低苏醒期躁动潜在风险或不良事件的发生。 Objective To explore the high-risk factors of patients'restlessness during the recovery period after general anesthesia,from this,nursing staff should pay high attention to prevent accidents.Methods We selected 194 cases of patients with general anesthesia admitted to our hospital from August 2017 to August 2019 by using convenience sampling method as the study objects.The relevant information and data of the patients were collected,and the multi-factor logistic regression analysis was used to determine the high-risk factors of restlessness in patients during recovery period after general anesthesia.Results Among the 194 cases of patients undergoing general anesthesia,35cases(18.04%)of patients developed restlessness.The men,postoperative no-analgesia,indwelling catheter,drug hypnosis,and different types of surgery were the independent risk factors affecting the restlessness of patients during the recovery period after general anesthesia(P<0.05).Conclusion There were many high-risk factors leading to restlessness in patients during the recovery period after general anesthesia.The nursing staff should pay great attention to strengthen prevention and completely eradicate or reduce the potential risk of restlessness during recovery period or adverse events.
作者 李敏 杨爱玲 LI Min;YANG Ai-ling
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2020年第12期118-120,共3页 Nursing Practice and Research
关键词 全麻术 苏醒期 躁动 高危因素 护理干预 General anesthesia Recovery period Restlessness High-risk factors Nursing intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献126

  • 1马冠生,朱丹红,胡小琪,栾德春,孔灵芝,杨晓光.中国居民饮酒行为现况[J].营养学报,2005,27(5):362-365. 被引量:191
  • 2邓立琴,丁风兰,刘红.全麻术后躁动225例分析[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(2):165-167. 被引量:291
  • 3刘新.539例全麻手术患者苏醒期躁动原因分析及护理[J].中华护理杂志,2007,42(10):886-888. 被引量:114
  • 4李向荣,彭顺秀,覃丽华,李英姿.全麻苏醒期患儿躁动危险因素探讨[J].护理学报,2007,14(12):1-2. 被引量:17
  • 5Yu D, Chai W, Sun X, et al. Emergence agitation in adults: risk factors in 2 0130 patients [J ]. Can J Anae- sth, 2010,57(9): 843-848.
  • 6Dahmani S, Stany I, Brasher C, et al. Pharmaco- logical prevention of sevoflurane-and desflura-nerelated emergence agitation in children: a meta-analysis of published studies[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2010,104: 216- 223.
  • 7Maeda S, Tomoyasu Y, Higuchi H, et al. Midazolam is associated with delay in recovery and agitation after ambulatory general anesthesia for dental treatment in patients with disabi-lities: a retrospective cohort study [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012,70(6) : 1315 - 1320.
  • 8K6ner O, Tfire H, Mercan A, et al. Effects of hydroxyzine-midazolam premedication on sevoflurane- induced paediatric emergence agitation: a prospective randomised clinical trial [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2011,28(9) : 640-645.
  • 9Milic M, Goranovic T, Knezevic P. Complications of sevoflurane-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesth- esia in pediatric cleft lip and palate surgery: a rando- mized comparison study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,39:5-9.
  • 10Chen J, Li W, Hu X, et al. Emergence agitation after cataract surgery in children, a comparison of midazo- lam, propofol and ketamine [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2010,20(9) : 873 -879.

共引文献309

同被引文献112

引证文献9

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部