比较视角下的中国科研不端查处政策--兼评《科研诚信案件调查处理规则(试行)》

China’s Research Misconduct Policy from a Comparative Perspective:Review of Rules for the Handling of Cases of Research Integrity(Trial)

中国的科研不端查处政策已发展了十余年,《科研诚信案件调查处理规则(试行)》标志着政策走向成熟,形成了科研不端管理的中国方案。为客观地评价中国科研不端政策取得的进步与不足,文章在回顾中国科研不端查处政策发展历程的基础上,采用比较研究的方法,构建了包含政策范围、查处程序和保障措施三个维度的分析框架。借助该分析框架,得出《科研诚信案件调查处理规则(试行)》相较于国内其他代表性政策的变革与进步,以及相较于国际代表性政策所表现出的本土特征。最后文章就如何进一步完善中国科研不端查处政策提出三项建议。

The"Rules for the Handling of Cases of Research Integrity(Trial)"is China’s most authoritative and perfect research misconduct policy,marking that China’s research misconduct policy is becoming mature.In order to objectively evaluate the content of this policy,summarize the progress and deficiencies,this article reviews the development history of China’s research misconduct policy,then adopts a comparative research method to build an analytical framework that includes three dimensions:policy scope,investigation procedures,and safeguard measures.Furthermore,this policy was compared separately with the policy issued by Ministry of Science and Technology,the Ministry of Education and the U.S.government.Finally,the policy innovation and some suggestions to improve China’s research misconduct policy are also discussed.