基于专家智慧的国家自然科学基金学科申请代码体系调整研究

Research on the Adjustment of NSFC Subject Application Code Based on Expert Wisdom

随着科学的发展,特别是新兴学科和交叉学科的不断涌现,科研工作者对基金申请代码管理体系提出了更高的要求。本文通过双清论坛和国家自然科学基金委员会后评估会议向国家自然科学基金领域的资深专家发放问卷,并进行统计分析,集结专家关于申请代码调整的智慧,对代码本身的设置、代码使用的优化以及代码调整的流程进行了分析。研究发现:(1)专家普遍期望代码有更高的包容度,这体现在内涵更宽泛、调整周期更短以及为新学科发展预留更多空间的代码设置原则等方面;(2)在代码使用问题最突出的交叉学科领域,专家希望国家自然科学基金委员会对交叉学科代码的设置能适应并引领学科部深度融合的发展趋势,并希望代码设置能够体现交叉学科理论创新与应用创新共同发展需求;(3)由于代码调整流程影响着代码调整的科学合理性,本文在最后总结归纳了专家给出的三种流程设计方案。

With science development and the emergence of new and interdisciplinary disciplines,researchers have put forward higher requirements for the management system of science foundation application code.In this paper,questionnaires are performed on senior experts in the National Natural Science Foundation of China through the Shuangqing Forum and the post-assessment meeting of the National Natural Science Foundation of China.A statistical analysis is performed to gather the questionnaires about applying for the codes adjustments,and to optimize the settings of the codes themselves and the use of the codes.Meanwhile,the process of code adjustment is analyzed.The main conclusions are as follows:(1)Experts generally expect a higher degree of inclusiveness of codes,which is reflected in the broader connotation,shorter adjustment cycle,and code setting principles that reserve more space for the development of new disciplines.(2)In the field of interdisciplinary areas with the most prominent problems in code use,experts hope that the setting of interdisciplinary codes of NFSC can adapt to and lead the trend of the deep integration across different departments,and that code setting can reflect the needs of theoretical innovation and application innovation.(3)As the process of code adjustment affects the rationality of code adjustment,this article summarizes three process design schemes based on experts suggestions.