期刊文献+

平面内技术与平面外技术在超声引导下的斜角肌间隙臂丛神经阻滞中的临床效果 被引量:4

Clinical effect ultrasound-guided inter-scalene brachial plexus blockage: in-plane technology versus out-of-plane technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨平面内穿刺技术和平面外穿刺技术在超声引导下的斜角肌间隙臂丛神经阻滞中的效果,便捷性及并发症的发生率。方法:选择上肢手术需要行臂丛麻醉的患者60例,随机分为超声平面内技术组(UI组)和超声平面外技术组(UO组)。观察两组患者臂丛神经阻滞图像定位时间、操作时间、臂丛神经主要分支阻滞程度(完全阻滞、部分阻滞、未阻滞)、麻醉效果(优、良、差)、并发症(局麻药中毒、血肿、声嘶、气胸、神经损伤、呼吸困难、Horner综合征)发生率。结果:两组患者图像定位时间无明显差异[(66.90±2.13s) vs(67.83±3.53s),P>0.05],与平面内组相比,平面外组穿刺操作时间更短[(137.66±18.95s) vs(191.19±15.60s),P<0.05];两组患者的臂丛神经主要分支阻滞程度、麻醉效果、并发症发生率无显著差异。结论:平面内及平面外技术都可以较好地用于超声引导的斜角肌间隙臂丛神经阻滞,平面外技术用时更短。 Objective To investigate the effect,convenience and the incidence of complications of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus blockage when in-plane technology and out-of-plane technology were used.Method Sixty patients undergoing selective upper limb operation were selected and randomly devided into two groups:In-plane technology group(group UI)and Out-of-plane technology group(group UO).The duration of image acquisition and puncture were recorded and compared.The exent of sensory blockade of main branches of branchial plexus(rated as completely-block,partial block,not block)was recorded and compared.The anesthetic effect of surgical field(rated as exellence,good and failure)was also assessed and compared.The incidence of complications(such as local anesthesia intoxication,Hematoma,Hoarseness,Pneumothorax,Nerve injury,Dyspnea,Horner syndrome)were observeded and compared.Results There were no difference with the image acquisition time between group UI and group UO[(66.90±2.13)s vs(67.83±3.53)s,P>0.05];Compared with group UI,group UO had a obviously shorter puncture time[(137.66±18.95)s vs(191.19±15.60)s,P<0.05].There were no difference with the exent of sensory blockade of main branches of branchial plexus,the anesthetic effect of surgical field or the incidence of complications between group UI and group UO.Conclusion Both in-plane and out-plane technology can be used for ultrasound-guided inter-scalene brachial plexus blockage but the out-of-plane technology takes shorter time.
作者 卿帅 徐连生 王晓军 QING Shuai;XU Lian-sheng;WANG Xiao-jun(The First People’s Hospital of Yibin,Yibin 644000,china)
出处 《吉林医学》 CAS 2020年第7期1574-1576,共3页 Jilin Medical Journal
关键词 超声 臂丛 神经阻滞 平面内 平面外 Ultrasound Brachial plexus Nerve blockage In-plane technology Out-of-plane technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1李挺,吴道珠,徐旭仲,黄品同.上肢手术病人超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(2):126-129. 被引量:93
  • 2车薛华,梁伟民.B超辅助锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞-两种定位方法的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(3):245-246. 被引量:10
  • 3米勒.米勒麻醉学[M].曾因明,邓小明.译.6版.北京:北京大学出版社.2006:352.
  • 4Capdevila X, Biboulet P, Morau D, et al. How and why to use ultrasound for regional blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, 2008,59:147-154.
  • 5Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, et al. Ultrasound guidance compared wish electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth, 2009,102:408-417.
  • 6van Geffen GJ, van den BE, Brank GJ, et al. A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound guided versus nerve stimulation guided distal sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2009,37 : 32-37.
  • 7崔旭蕾,徐仲煌,郭向阳,任洪智.小儿外周神经阻滞的临床应用进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(8):702-704. 被引量:37
  • 8Fanelli G, Casati A, Garancini P, et al. Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: failure rate, patient acceptance, and neurologie complications. Study Group on Regional Anesthesia. Anesth Analg, 1999,88:847 852.
  • 9Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth, 2005,94:7-17.
  • 10Williams SR,Chouinard P, Arcand G, et al. Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraelavieular block. Anesth Analg, 2003,97 : 1518-1523.

共引文献125

同被引文献50

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部