期刊文献+

限制性椎板切除术后颈椎曲度大小与脊髓后移的关系及对轴性症状的影响 被引量:3

Relationship between Cervical Curvature and Spinal Cord Posterior Movementafter Limited Laminectomy and Its Effect on Axial Symptoms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 观察颈椎后路限制性椎板减压术后颈椎曲度大小与颈髓后移距离的关系及对手术疗效的影响。2016年1月至2017年12月,有87例颈椎曲度正常的脊髓型颈椎病患者在邯郸市中心医院接受限制性椎板切除术治疗,其中有74例获得完整的临床随访。术后根据harrison方法测量颈椎曲度并将其分为:A组,颈椎曲度变减小(0°≤颈椎角≤16.5°);B组,颈椎曲度正常(颈椎角>16.5°)。术后观察两组患者神经功能改善情况、脊髓后移距离、颈椎活动度(range of motion,ROM)、轴性症状严重程度及C5神经麻痹发生情况。在平均23.8个月的临床随访中,36例患者(A组)的颈椎曲度变小(48.6%),平均颈椎角为9.7°±5.3°;38例患者(B组)颈椎曲度维持正常(51.4%),颈椎角为18.7°±4.6°,两组颈椎曲度比较具有显著统计学差异(P<0.05);A组椎板切除宽度为(18.5±2.1)mm,B组为(17.9±1.8)mm,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组脊髓后移距离为(1.8±0.5)mm,B组为(2.6±0.8)mm,具有显著统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后两组患者的ROM较术前无明显减小(P>0.05),日本矫形外科协会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)评分均较术前有明显升高(P<0.05),组间比较无显著统计学差异(P>0.05);A组轴性症状严重程度明显重于B组(P<0.05);A组有3例(8.3%)患者发生C5神经麻痹,B组有4例(10.5%),两组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。以上结果表明,限制性椎板切除术后仍有近半数的患者出现颈椎曲度丢失,颈椎曲度减小使得脊髓后移距离缩短并增加轴性症状的严重程度,而颈椎曲度与神经恢复效果及C5神经麻痹无明显关联。 The research was aim to observe the relationship between cervical curvature and the distance of cervical cord shift after posterior limited laminectomy and its effect on surgical outcome.From January 2016 to December 2017,87 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were treated with limited laminectomy in Handan Central Hospital,and 74 of them received complete clinical follow-up.Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the cervical curvature measured by Harrison.The cervical curvature of patients in Group A decreased(0°≤cervical vertebra angle≤16.5°),and the cervical curvature of patients in group B was normal(cervical vertebra angle>16.5°).The neurological improvement,spinal cord drift distance,range of motion(ROM),axial symptoms and C5 paralysis were observed and analyzed.The results show that 36 cases in group A and the cervical vertebra angle is 9.7°±5.3°,and 38 cases in group B and the cervical vertebra angle is 18.7°±4.6°(P<0.05)during an average follow-up of 23.8 months.The laminectomy width in group A is(18.5±2.1)mm,and in group B is(17.9±1.8)mm(P>0.05).The spinal cord drift distance is(1.8±0.5)mm in group A and(2.6±0.8)mm in group B,which is statistically significant(P<0.05).The ROM in the 2 groups is not significantly decreased when compared with the pre-operative level(P>0.05),and the JOA scores are significantly increased than those before surgery(P<0.05).The axial symptoms based on VAS score in group A are significantly higher than that in group B(P<0.05).There are 3 cases(8.3%)of C5 palsy in group A and 4 cases(10.5%)of C5 palsy in group B(P>0.05).Nearly half of the patients have cervical curvature loss after limited laminectomy.The reduction of cervical curvature reduces the spinal cord drift distance and increases the severity of axial symptoms.The cervical curvature has no relationship with neurological recovery and C5 palsy.
作者 田金辉 李志远 孙晓琳 李少伟 江仲超 苗洁 刘法敬 TIAN Jin-hui;LI Zhi-yuan;SUN Xiao-lin;LI Shao-wei;JIANG Zhong-chao;MIAO Jie;LIU Fa-jing(Department of Orthopedics,Handan Central Hospital,Handan 056001,China;Department of Obstetrics,Handan Central Hospital,Handan 056001,China;Department of Orthopedics,Luquan People s Hospital of Shijiazhuang,Shijiazhuang 050200,China;Department of Spine Surgery,Tianjin Hospital,Tianjin 300000,China)
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2020年第17期6768-6772,共5页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 河北省医学科学研究重点课题(20191830)。
关键词 脊髓型颈椎病 全椎板减压 颈椎曲度 脊髓后移 C5神经麻痹 cervical spondylotic myelopathy laminectomy cervical curvature spinal cord drift C5 palsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献61

  • 1曾岩,党耕町,马庆军.颈椎前路融合术后颈部运动功能的评价[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(24):1481-1484. 被引量:96
  • 2藏磊,刘忠军,党耕町,刘晓光.颈椎病伴椎管狭窄手术入路的选择[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(9):653-656. 被引量:17
  • 3张为,陈百成,申勇,董玉昌,丁文元,李宝俊,姚晓光.颈3椎板切除单开门成形术对颈椎轴性症状的影响[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(8):544-548. 被引量:50
  • 4陈银海,姚红华,杨忠.颈椎曲度的X线测量在颈椎病康复评定中的应用价值[J].中国康复,2007,22(3):156-158. 被引量:25
  • 5Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, et al. Cerrical spine align- ment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review[J]. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2013, 19(2): 141-159.
  • 6Takeshita K, Murakami M, Kobayashi A, et al. Relationship between cervical curvature index (Ishihara) and cervical spine angle (C2-7)[J]. Journal of orthopaedic science, 2001, 6(3): 223-226.
  • 7Ohara A, Miyamoto K, Naganawa T, et al. Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine[J]. Spine, 2006, 31 (22): 2585-2591.
  • 8Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, et al. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods[J]. Spine, 2001, 26(11): 235-242.
  • 9Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, et al. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(16): 2072-2078.
  • 10Nguyen NLM, Baluch DA, Patel AA. Cervical sagittal bal- ance: A review[J]. Contemporary spine surgery, 2014, 15(1): 1-7.

共引文献197

同被引文献30

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部