期刊文献+

中文版欧洲癌症治疗与研究生命质量-灵性健康量表的信度效度评定 被引量:13

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the European Quality of Life-Spiritual Health Scale for Cancer Therapy and Research in patients with advanced cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:翻译、修订欧洲癌症治疗与研究生命质量-灵性健康量表(the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-spiritual well-being 32,EORTC QLQ-SWB32),并对其信度、效度进行检验。方法:严格按照跨文化调适步骤进行EORTC QLQ-SWB32量表的修订,形成中文版EORTC QLQ-SWB27评估量表。采用便利取样法,选取沈阳市某三级甲等医院符合纳入与排除标准的270例晚期癌症患者,使用中文版EORTC QLQ-SWB27对晚期癌症患者进行评估。结果:中文版EORTC QLQ-SWB27量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.792,4个维度的Cronbach’sα系数为0.606~0.862;重测信度0.886;I-CVI为0.83~1.00,S-CVI为0.97;采用主成分分析法提取了特征根>1的4个因子,累积贡献率为51.7%。结论:中文版EORTC QLQ-SWB27灵性健康量表具有较好的信度、效度,可作为中国文化背景下晚期癌症患者灵性健康的测量工具。 Objective:To translate the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-spiritual well-being 32(EORTC QLQ-SWB32)into Chinese,and to assess its reliability and validity.Methods:The EORTC QLQ-SWB32 was translated strictly by the steps of cross-cultural adjustment to form the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-SWB27 scale.A total of 270 patients with advanced cancer meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria in a tertiary hospital in Shenyang were recruited by convenience sampling and investigated using the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-SWB27.Results:The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-SWB27 scale was 0.792,and it was 0.606 to 0.862 for each sub-dimensions.Its test-retest reliability was 0.886;I-CVI was 0.83-1 and S-CVI was 0.97.Four factors with characteristic root>1 were extracted by principal component analysis,and the cumulative contribution rate was 51.7%.Conclusion:The Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-SWB27 scale has good reliability and validity,and can be used as a instrument to measure spiritual health of patients with advanced cancer in the context of Chinese culture.
作者 孙向红 范玲 SUN Xianghong;FAN Ling(Intensive Care Unit,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang,110021,China)
出处 《中国护理管理》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期826-830,共5页 Chinese Nursing Management
基金 《中国护理管理》杂志社护理管理科研基金资助项目(CNM-2017-03)。
关键词 肿瘤 晚期癌症 灵性健康 信度 效度 量表 tumor advanced cancer spiritual health reliability validity scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1沈艳红,常文虎,彭迎春.如何测量问卷的效度[J].中华医院管理杂志,2004,20(11):704-704. 被引量:31
  • 2徐凤珍.护理服务质量的感知与期望分析[J].护理研究(下旬版),2006,20(1):260-260. 被引量:9
  • 3杨晓莉,吕海燕,李曙光.医生和护士对医护合作所持态度的对比研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(5):466-469. 被引量:125
  • 4尹祚芊 林小玲 冯容庄 等.个案管理师与医师临床实务合作之分析.荣总护理,2002,19(2):113-124.
  • 5薛薇.SPSS统计分析方法及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2010:234-293.
  • 6Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 7Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 8Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 9Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 10Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.

共引文献1146

同被引文献151

引证文献13

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部