长江经济带省域乡村振兴指数动态评价

Dynamic evaluation of provincial rural revitalization index in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

随着乡村振兴战略的提出,对乡村振兴战略的实施及成效评估成为各级决策部门与学者关注的重点,但以省域尺度对乡村振兴指数进行动态评价的研究尚不多见。基于此,以长江经济带11个省(市)为研究对象,以乡村振兴战略规划中的指标体系为基础,结合熵权法与层次分析法,构建乡村振兴指数的评价指标体系,分析2007-2016年长江经济带乡村振兴指数的时空变化,比较产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效和生活富裕5个层面的区位差异。研究结果表明,2007-2016年,乡村振兴总指数在长江经济带不同空间尺度上有不同程度的增长,长江经济带区域间5个层面的乡村振兴指数分布不均衡,区域间差距大。十年间,11个省(市)的乡村振兴指数排名波动较小,总体仍呈阶梯状分布。建议长江经济带省域乡村振兴应进一步加强落实乡村绿色发展的理念,保护乡村生态环境,推动区域间协调,促进农业农村发展。本研究结果可以为长江经济带地区及各省(市)制定乡村振兴相关政策提供依据与借鉴,也可以为其他地区开展乡村振兴综合评价提供参考。

With the promotion of rural revitalization strategy,the implementation and the evaluation of the strategy have become the hotspot issue.There were few studies on the dynamic evaluation of rural revitalization index at the provincial level.Based on this,11 provinces(cities)in the Yangtze River Economic Belt were taken as the research objects.Using entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process,the rural revitalization index system was established.The spatial-temporal changes of the rural revitalization index in the research area were analyzed from 2007 to 2016,and the regional differences were compared in five aspects:industrial prosperity,ecological livability,rural civilization,effective governance and affluent living.The results showed that the rural revitalization index had different figures on different spatial scales in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2007 to 2016.The five levels of rural revitalization index in the research area were unevenly distributed,and the regional gap couldn′t be ignored.In the past ten years,the ranking of rural revitalization index fluctuated slightly,nevertheless,the overall ranking was still stepped.The rural revitalization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt should strengthen the implementation of rural green development and promote inter-regional coordination in the development of agriculture and rural areas.This study can provide reference for the formulation of rural revitalization policies in the Yangtze River Economic Belt,and the conclusions can also provide reference for comprehensive evaluation of rural revitalization in other regions.