期刊文献+

蕴含主观业绩评价的教师激励契约设计——基于委托-代理理论的多案例研究 被引量:1

Teacher Incentive Contract Design with Subjective Performance Evaluation:A Multi-case Study Based on Principal-agent Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与奖惩资源结合的主观业绩评价是近来教师激励研究的一个新领域。从委托—代理理论视角切入,采用多案例研究方法,探索教师绩效工资制度下蕴含主观业绩评价的教师激励契约设计:主观业绩评价的应用程度、影响因素和有效性。研究发现:学校普遍使用客观业绩评价与主观业绩评价相结合的综合评价体系,且倾向于赋予客观业绩评价更高的权重;主观业绩评价的运用程度受内、外环境的约束,包括教育行政部门对学校工资分权程度、学校规模与发展阶段;学校评价者自身利益在薪酬分配中的技术安排影响主观业绩评价的有效性;主观业绩评价的主要成本来自领导偏好和教师讨好行为。 Subjective performance evaluation(SPE)combined with rewards and penalties is a new field of teacher incentive research in recent years.From the perspective of principal-agent theory,the study adopts the multi-case study approach to explore the teacher incentive contract design with subjective performance evaluation in teacher performance pay system,which includes the degree of application,the influencing factors and the effectiveness of SPE.It finds that the comprehensive evaluation system,which combines objective performance evaluation(OPE)with SPE,tends to give higher weight to OPE,that the degree of application of SPE is restricted by internal and external environments,including the degree of decentralization of school salary by the educational administrative department,the school scale and development stage,that the technical arrangement of the school evaluators’self-interest in the salary distribution affects the effectiveness of SPE,and that the main costs of SPE come from leaders’preference and teachers’ingratiating behavior.
作者 方征 张雯闻 梁迷 FANG Zheng;ZHANG Wen-wen;LIANG Mi(School of Education,South China Normal University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510631,China;Faculty of Public Administration,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510642,China)
出处 《教师发展研究》 2020年第2期36-45,共10页 Teacher Development Research
基金 广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划学科共建项目“义务教育学校校长工作绩效评估及模式创新研究”(GD17XJY07) 广东省教育厅特色创新类项目(教育科研)“文化对教育的影响”(2016GXJK034)。
关键词 绩效工资 教师激励 主观业绩评价 委托—代理理论 performance pay teacher incentive subjective performance evaluation principal-agent theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Frank W. Shaw. A Summary of Legal Implications of Teacher Evaluations for Merit Pay and a Model Plan, Educational Administration Quarterly, 1985.21 ; 51.
  • 2Tony Cutler and Barbara Waine. Rewarding Better Teachers? Performance Related Pay in Schools, Educational Management & Administration BEMAS, 1999, Vol.27 ( 1 ) : 55-70.
  • 3Murphy, K. J, Cleveland, J. N. Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective .Allyn, Bacon Publishers, 1991.
  • 4R.Chamherlin et al.Performance Related Pay and the Teaching Profession : A Review of the Literature, Research Papers in Education17, No. 1 ( 2002 ).
  • 5Michael Janofsky. Teacher Merit Pay Tied to Education Gains[ N ] .New York Times, Oct 4,2005.
  • 6Catherine Farrell and Jonathan Morris. Resigned Compliance Teacher Attitudes Towards Performance-Related Pay in Schools,Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 2004, Vol.32( 1 ) : 81-104.
  • 7Allan M. Mohrman, Jr, Susan Albers Mohrman and Allan R. Odden.Aligning Teacher Compensation with Systemic School Reform: Skill-Based Pay and Group-Based Performance Rewards educational evaluation and policy analysis, 2006,8 ; 51.
  • 8William A. Firestone. Merit Pay and Job Enlargement as Reforms: Incentives, hnplementation, and Teacher Response, educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1991, 13; 269.
  • 9陈丽珠.美国教育财政改革[M].台湾:五南图书出版公司,2000..
  • 10崔玉平.美国教育财政的理论与实践[M].海口:海南出版社,2004.176-178.

共引文献14

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部