期刊文献+

多维城市洪灾利益相关者分析——以浙江诸暨市为例

Multi-dimensional stakeholder analysis of urban flood:A case study of Zhuji City,Zhejiang Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于一些复杂且多变的利益相关者环境如城市洪涝灾害管理,一维分析法很难对其利益相关方进行特征区分和权重优选。以社会网络分析法为基础,综合了多种其他利益相关者分析方法,以浙江省诸暨市为例,建立了一个多维的城市洪灾利益相关者分析系统。该系统旨在为城市洪灾利益相关者参与机制和策略的设计与制定提供更为详细且多维的信息,从而使得城市洪灾管理更为有效。 For some complex and changeable stakeholder environments,such as urban flood management,it is diffi⁃cult for the one-dimensional analysis method to distinguish the characteristics and optimize the weight of stake⁃holders.Based on the social network analysis method,a variety of other stakeholder analysis methods are integrat⁃ed.Taking Zhuji City,Zhejiang Province as an example,a multi-dimensional urban flood stakeholder analysis sys⁃tem is established.This system provides more information for the participation mechanism and strategy formula⁃tion of urban flood stakeholders,so as to make urban flood management more effective.
作者 周恩丞 ZHOU Encheng(Zhejiang Design Institute of Water Conservancy&Hydro-electric Power,Hangzhou 310000)
出处 《中国防汛抗旱》 2020年第7期48-54,共7页 China Flood & Drought Management
关键词 利益相关者分析 城市洪灾管理 米切尔评分 社会网络 诸暨市 stakeholder analysis urban flood management Mitchell score-based approach social network Zhuji City
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1严玲,尹贻林,范道津.公共项目治理理论概念模型的建立[J].中国软科学,2004(6):130-135. 被引量:75
  • 2Turner J R. Towards a Theory of Project Management : The Nature of the Project Governance and Project Management [ J ]. International Journal of Project Management, 2006,24(2) : 93 -95.
  • 3Rowley T J. Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influence[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(4) : 887 -910.
  • 4Lyneis J M. System Dynamics for Market Forecasting and Structural Analysis[J]. System Dynamics Review, 2000, 16( 1 ) : 3 -25.
  • 5Sterman J D. Business Dynamics : Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World[ M ]. Boston : McGraw-Hill, 2000 : 1 - 7.
  • 6Saleh M, Oliva R, Kampmann C E, et al. A Comprehensive Analytical Approach for Policy Analysis of System Dynamics Models [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 203: 673- 683.
  • 7Greve H R, Baum J A C, Mitsuhashi H, et al. Built to Last but Falling Apart: Cohesion, Friction, and Withdrawal from Interfirm Alliances[ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53 (2) : 302 - 322.
  • 8Carayol N, Roux P. Collective Innovation in a Model of Network Formation with Preferential Meeting[ C ]. WEHIA Conference, Kiel, Germany, MD, 2003.
  • 9Lovell A M. Risking Risk: the Influence of Types of Capital and Social Networks on the Injection Practices of Drug Users[ J]. Social Science and Medicine, 2002, 55 (5) : 803 - 821.
  • 10Vilanova L. Neither Shareholder nor Stakeholder Management: What Happens When Firms are Run for their Short-term Salient Stakeholder? [ J]. European Management Journal, 2007, 25 (2) : 146 - 162.

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部