Value of intravoxel incoherent motion in detecting and staging liver fibrosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Liver fibrosis(LF) is a common pathological feature of all chronic liver diseases.With the accumulation of extracellular matrix in the fibrotic liver, true molecular water diffusion and perfusion-related diffusion are restricted. Intravoxel incoherent motion(IVIM) can capture the information on tissue diffusivity and microcapillary perfusion separately and reflect the fibrotic severity with diffusion coefficients.AIM To investigate the diagnostic performance of IVIM in detecting and staging LF with histology as a reference standard.METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies on the diagnostic accuracy of IVIM for assessment of histologically proven LF. The stages of LF were classified as F0(no fibrosis), F1(portal fibrosis without septa),F2(periportal fibrosis with few septa), F3(septal fibrosis), and F4(cirrhosis)according to histopathological findings. Data were extracted to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio, as well as the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC) in each group.RESULTS A total of 12 studies with 923 subjects were included in this meta-analysis with 5 studies(n = 465) for LF ≥ F1, 9 studies(n = 757) for LF ≥ F2, 4 studies(n = 413) for LF ≥ F3, and 6 studies(n = 562) for LF = F4. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated to be 0.78(95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.82) and 0.81(0.74-0.86)for LF ≥ F1 detection with IVIM;0.82(0.79-0.86) and 0.80(0.75-0.84) for staging F2 fibrosis;0.85(0.79-0.90) and 0.83(0.77-0.87) for staging F3 fibrosis, and 0.90(0.84-0.94) and 0.75(0.70-0.79) for detecting F4 cirrhosis, respectively. The AUCs for LF≥ F1, F2, F3, F4 detection were 0.862(0.811-0.914), 0.883(0.856-0.909), 0.886(0.865-0.907), and 0.899(0.866-0.932), respectively. Moderate to substantial heterogeneity was observed with inconsistency index(I2) ranging from 0% to 77.9%. No publication bias was detected.CONCLUSION IVIM is a noninvasive tool with good diagnostic performance in detecting and staging LF. Optimized and standardized IVIM protocols are needed to further improve its diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.