说《卷耳》“我马玄黄”

Discussion on“Womaxuanhuang”of Juaner

20世纪20年代,郭沫若先生于上海泰东书局出版《卷耳集》后,初出茅庐的曹聚仁先生即展开了与郭沫若先生关于《卷耳》一诗中“我马玄黄”的激烈讨论。郭沫若先生赞成毛《传》“玄马病则黄”之说,而曹聚仁先生则倾向陈奂“马病则玄黄”之论。之前有学者怀疑“我马玄黄”一句的语序问题,安徽大学藏战国竹简《卷耳》篇的公布排除了这种可能。因此,“我马玄黄”一句的理解仍未有确诂,还值得进一步研究。

In the 1920s,after Guo Moruo published the collection of Juaner in Shanghai’s TaiDong Publisher,Cao juren started a heated discussion with him about“womaxuanhuang”in his collection of Juaner.Guo Moruo agreed with the idea“xuanmabingzehuang”of Mao Shi Gu Xun Zhuan,while Cao Juren was inclined to Chen Huan’s theory that“mabingzexuanhuang”.Some scholars doubted the word order of the sentence“womaxuanhuang”before,but the publication of Chu bamboo slips of warring states period collected by Anhui University has ruled out this possibility.Therefore,to understand of the sentence“womaxuanhuang”is still undefined and deserves further study.