摘要
从影响及调节的角度切入,采用SBM-ML指数法、面板门槛和面板向量自回归模型,厘清我国环境政策自深化稳定以来差异化环境规制工具与工业绿色发展之间的关系。研究结果显示:(1)命令控制型与公众自愿型环境规制工具对工业绿色发展的影响效应随规制强度增加呈倒“U”型趋势,但前者影响更大;市场激励型环境规制工具对工业绿色发展的影响效应则与规制强度成反比。(2)短期内命令控制型与公众自愿型环境规制工具对工业绿色发展的调节效应灵活且相反,但后者幅度更大;长期内则有市场激励型环境规制工具对工业绿色发展呈持续正向调节。基于研究结论,提出综合差异化环境规制工具建立一个平衡、动态协调的环境规制混合系统的建议。
From the perspective of influence and adjustment,this paper adopts the SBM-ML index method,panel threshold model and panel vector autoregression model to clarify the relationship between different environmental regulation tools and industrial green development since the deepening and stability of China's environmental policy.The results show that:(1)The impact of command-control regulation tool and public-voluntary regulation tool on industrial green development is inverted"U"type with the increase of regulatory intensity,and the former has greater influence effect,while the market-driven regulation tool on industrial green development is inversely proportional to the regulatory intensity.(2)In short term,the command-control regulation tool and public-voluntary regulation tool have a flexible and opposite adjustment on industrial green development,and the latter has a larger range,while in long term,the market-driven regulation tool has a continuous and positive adjustment on industrial green development.Based on the findings,a balanced and dynamically coordinated hybrid system of environmental regulation is proposed by combining differentiated environmental regulation tools.
作者
闫莹
孙亚蓉
俞立平
展婷变
Yan Ying;Sun Yarong;Yu Liping;Zhan Tingbian(School of Economics and Management,North University of China,Taiyuan 030051,China;School of Statistics and Mathematics,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China;North University of China,Taiyuan 030051,China)
出处
《科技管理研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第12期239-247,共9页
Science and Technology Management Research
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目“社会-技术变迁驱动能源转型的动力机制及治理政策研究”(71874119)
山西省软科学研究项目“基于创新驱动视角的企业创新成长机制与激励政策研究”(2017041013-5)
中北大学人文社会科学研究基金项目“异质性环境规制对工业绿色发展的影响研究”(ZYJG201905)。
关键词
环境规制
工业
绿色发展
调节效应
environmental regulation
industry
green development
regulatory effect