期刊文献+

不同语境下交流学习双方语言相似性的比较 被引量:1

A Comparison of Language Similarity between Two Sides of Communicative Learning in Different Contexts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 设计交流学习任务和个人迁移任务,采用交流范式,探查了不同语境下交流学习双方语言相似性特征。结果显示:(1)语言交流方式下双方语言相似性水平最高,其次是对象可视方式,最后是表情和对象可视方式。(2)交流双方语言相似性随交流进程呈现倒U型分布,仅表情方式下自b6开始语言相似性相对稳定。(3)交流任务b10中双方相似性的交流语境效应显著,个人任务中不显著;表情方式下任务类型主效应不显著。结果发现:随着交流语境中非语言因素的增加,语言对于双方认知协调作用逐渐减弱;表情可视性促进了语言参照惯例的形成效率;仅表情和对象可视语境下双方相似性在交流和个人任务间表现出一致性。 In the study,communicative learning task and individual task were designed.The communicative paradigm was used to explore the language similarity between both sides of communicative learning in different contexts.The results showed that:(1)The language similarity level between the two sides was the highest under the way of language communication,followed by the object visual way,and finally the expression and object visual way.(2)The language similarity between both sides showed an inverted U-shaped with the process of communication,and the language similarity was relatively stable from the block 6 only under the way of expression.(3)In the block 10 of the communication task,the communicative context effect of similarity was significant,but that of the individual task was not significant.The main effect of task type was not significant in the way of expression.The results suggested that:with the increase of non-language factors in the communication context,the cognitive coordination of language gradually diminished.Expression visibility promoted the formation efficiency of language referential convention.Only under the expression and object visual context the similarity showed consistency between communication task and individual task.
作者 张恒超 ZHANG Hengchao(Department of Psychalogy,School of Law,Tianjin Uniersity of Commerce,Tianin 300134)
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第4期440-448,共9页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC190029)。
关键词 交流 语言 语境 相似性 communication language context similarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献144

  • 1沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):2-6. 被引量:83
  • 2Bangerter,A.,&Clark,H.H.(2003).Navigating joint projects withdialogue.Cognitive Science,27(2),195-225.
  • 3Barr,D.J.,&Kronmuller,E.(2006).Conversation as a site ofcategory learning and category use.Psychology of Learning andMotivation,47,181-211.
  • 4Blair,M.,&Homa,D.L.(2005).Integrating novel dimensions toeliminate category exceptions:when more is less.Journal ofExperimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,31(2),258-271.
  • 5Brennan,S.E.,Chen,X.,Dickinson,C.A.,Neider,M.B.,&Zelinsky,G.J.(2008).Coordinating cognition:The costs andbenefits of shared gaze during collaborative search.Cognition,106(3),1465-1477.
  • 6Brown,Schmidt,S.(2009).Partner specific interpretation ofmaintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.Journal ofMemory and Language,in press.
  • 7Clark,H.H.(1996).Using language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Clark,H.H.,&Krych,M.(2004).Speaking while monitoringaddressees for understanding.Journal of Memory and Language,50(1),62-81.
  • 9Corter,J.,&Gluck,M.(1992).Explaining basic categories:Featurepredictability and information.Psychological Bulletin,111(2),291-303.
  • 10Gentner,D.,&Kurtz,K.(2005).Relational categories.In W.K.Ahn.,R.L.,Goldstone.,B.C.Love.,A.B.Markman.,&P.W.Wolff.(Eds.),Categorization inside and outside the lab(pp.151-175).Washington,DC:APA.

共引文献65

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部