期刊文献+

经会阴前列腺靶向穿刺和系统穿刺与根治术后病理结果的一致性分析 被引量:9

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经直肠超声多参数磁共振(TRUS-mpMRI)图像融合引导下经会阴前列腺靶向穿刺活检与根治性前列腺切除术后病理结果的一致性。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年6月行TRUS-mpMRI图像融合经会阴前列腺穿刺活检确诊为前列腺癌患者383例的临床资料。所有患者穿刺前已完善mpMRI,并对mpMRI上出现的可疑病灶经确认后行前列腺图像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分。每例患者均在局麻下行TRUS-mpMRI图像融合引导下的经会阴前列腺靶向穿刺,之后进行标准12针系统穿刺。比较并分析靶向穿刺、系统穿刺结果与根治性前列腺切除术后病理结果的一致性。结果:靶向穿刺中有68例(17.75%)患者出现病理结果升级,显著低于系统穿刺中104例(27.15%)出现病理结果升级(P=0.002);靶向穿刺中有63例(16.45%)患者出现病理结果降级,系统穿刺中有71例(18.54%)患者出现病理结果降级,两种穿刺方法在病理降级上无统计学差异。结论:TRUS-mpMRI图像融合经会阴前列腺靶向穿刺活检相比系统穿刺活检的病理结果更接近根治性前列腺切除术后病理结果。
出处 《江苏大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2020年第4期361-363,368,共4页 Journal of Jiangsu University:Medicine Edition
基金 江苏省卫计委青年基金资助项目(Q2017005)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1Ramos J, Uchio E, Asian M, et al. Changes in Glen- son scores for prostate cancer, what should we expect from a measurementEJ-]? J Investig Med, 2010, 58(4) : 625--628.
  • 2Nayyar R, Singh P, Gupta N P, et al. Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen com- pared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: an Indian experience[J]. Indian J Urol, 2010, 26(I), 56-59.
  • 3Presti J C Jr, Chang J J, Bhargava V, et al. The opti- mal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies, results ol a prospectiveclinical trial[J]. J Urol, 2000, 163(I). 163-166 discussion 166--167.
  • 4Grossfeld G D, Chang J J, Broering J M, et al. Under staging and under grading in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, resultsfrom the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database[J]. J Urol, 2001, 165(3) : 851-- 856.
  • 5King C R. Patterns of prostate cancer biopsy grading: trends and clinical implications[J]. Int J Cancer, 2000, 90(6) : 305-311.
  • 6Cohen M S, Hanley R S, Kurteva T, et al. Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: theLahey Clinic Medical Center experi- ence and an international recta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol, 2008, 54(2): 371--381.
  • 7Hambrock T, Hocks C, HuIsbergen-van de Kaa C, et al. Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggres- siveness using 3-T diffusion-weightedmagnetic reso- nance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10- core transrectalultrasound prostate biopsy cohort [J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(1): 177--184.
  • 8Moore C M, Robertson N L, Arsanious N, et al. Im- age-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targetsz a systematic review[J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 63(1): 125--140.
  • 9Epstein J I, Walsh P C, Carter H B. Dedifferentiation of prostate cancer grade with time in men followed ex- pectantly for stage Tlc disease[J]. J Urol, 2001, 166 (5) : 1688--1691.
  • 10Sarici H, Telli O, Yigitbasi O, et al. Predictors of G1- eason score upgrading in patients with prostate biopsy Gleason score <6[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2014, 8(5- 6) : E342--E3466.

共引文献21

同被引文献79

引证文献9

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部