桡骨远端骨折采用保守与手术治疗的临床效果分析

Comparative analysis of clinical effect of conservative and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture

目的:对比保守治疗与手术治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床效果。方法:2013年7月-2018年9月收治桡骨远端骨折患者93例,根据不同治疗方法分为两组。保守组采用手法复位等保守治疗;手术治疗组通过切开复位钢板内固定等方式进行治疗。比较两组临床效果及并发症发生率。结果:手术治疗组术后腕关节功能恢复优良率显著高于保守治疗组,且并发症发生率低于保守治疗组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:手术治疗桡骨远端骨折临床效果优于保守治疗。

Objective:To compare the clinical effect of conservative treatment and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture.Methods:From July 2013 to September 2018,93 patients with distal radius fracture were enrolled,they were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods.The conservative treatment group was treated with manipulative reduction and other conservative treatment;The surgical treatment group was treated by open reduction plate internal fixation and other treatment.The clinical effect and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The excellent and good recovery rate of wrist function in the surgical treatment group was significantly higher than in the conservative treatment group,the incidence of complications was lower than in the conservative treatment group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of surgical treatment of distal radius fracture is better than the conservative treatment.