期刊文献+

急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者D-二聚体与GRACE评分和冠脉病变程度的关系 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者D-二聚体与全球急性冠状动脉(冠脉)事件注册(GRACE)评分和冠脉病变程度的关系进行探讨.方法 选取65例急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者为研究组,另选取同期55例冠脉造影阴性患者为对照组,测定GRACE评分与D-二聚体水平,统计冠脉病变支数与Gensini积分.结果 相较于低危组与中危组,高危组单支血管病变占比更低,三支血管病变占比更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);低危组与中危组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).相关性分析结果显示,GRACE评分与冠脉病变支数呈正相关性(r=0.429,P=0.001<0.05).高危组Gensini积分高于低危组,差异有统计学意义(t=8.052,P=0.001<0.05);高危组Gensini积分高于中危组,差异有统计学意义(t=11.629,P=0.001<0.05);中危组与低危组Gensini积分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=2.013,P=0.055>0.05).相关性分析结果显示,GRACE评分与Gensini积分呈正相关性(r=0.261,P=0.001<0.05).研究组D-二聚体与Gensini积分分别为(701.46±45.58)ng/ml、(55.82±5.20)分,均高于对照组的(281.79±23.67)ng/ml、(2.15±0.38)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组相关性分析结果显示,研究组D-二聚体与Gensini积分之间具有明显相关性(r=0.618,P=0.001<0.05),对照组D-二聚体与Gensini积分之间无明显相关性(r=0.106,P=0.594>0.05).结论 在急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死中,D-二聚体与冠脉病变程度呈正相关性,D-二聚体与GRACE评分能够评估冠脉病变程度.
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2020年第13期51-53,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献69

  • 1丁文惠.不稳定性心绞痛和非ST段抬高心肌梗死的危险分层和处理[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2004,6(6):430-432. 被引量:6
  • 2王小艳.急性冠脉综合征后6个月死亡和心肌梗死的预测:前瞻性的多国观察性研究(GRACE)[J].中国处方药,2006(11):25-26. 被引量:137
  • 3Gensini GG.A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. The American Journal of Cardiology . 1983
  • 4GRANGER C B, GOLDBERG R J, DABBOUS O, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global regis- try of acute coronary events[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2003, 163: 2345-2353.
  • 5ANTMAN E M, COHEN M, BERNINK P J, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST ele- vation MI: a method for prognostication and thera-peutic decision making[J]. JAMA, 2000, 284: 835- 842.
  • 6BOERSMA E, PIEPER K S, STEYERBERG E W, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with acute cor- onary syndromes without persistent ST-segment ele- vation. Results from an international trial of 9461 pa- tients. The PURSUIT Investigators[J]. Circulation, 2000, 101: 2557-2567.
  • 7DASCENZO F, BIONDI-ZOCCAI G, MORETTI C, et al. TIMI, GRACE and alternative risk scores in A- cute Coronary Syndromes: a meta-analysis of 40 deri- vation studies on 216,552 patients and of 42 validation studies on 31,625 patients[J]. Contemp Clin Trials, 2012, 33: 507-514.
  • 8KHALILL R, HAN L, JING C, et al. The use of risk of risk scores for stratification of non-ST eleva- tion acute coronary syndrome patients[J]. Exp Clin Cardiol, 2009, 14: e25-e30.
  • 9PRABHUDESAI A R, SRILAKSHMI M A, SAN- TOSH M J, et al. Validation of the GRACE score for prognosis in Indian patients with acute coronary syn- dromes[J]. Indian Heart J, 2012, 64: 263-269.
  • 10AKGUL O, UYAREL H, PUSUROGLU H, et al. Predictive value of elevated D-dimer in patients under- going primary angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 2013, 24: 704-710.

共引文献44

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部