期刊文献+

民国《楞严百伪》案重审之新资料补遗 被引量:1

Newly-found Literature Supplement to the Rebuttal to Shurangama Hundred Falseness in Early Republic of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《楞严经》的真伪是学术史一件悬而未决的大事,吕澂先生有《楞严百伪》,影响很大。然而长期以来,资料缺失,人们无意中遗漏了民国当年对吕澂的辩驳。其实,早在当年,吕澂已经被强力批驳。笔者据新发现的一些资料,还原民国时期楞严真伪之争的来龙去脉,对当年佛教界高僧等对吕澂等的批驳进行补遗。本文最大的特点是新发现了关于《楞严经》真伪之争的、自民国以来遗漏了79年的佛教界僧人等对吕澂反驳的资料,这对重新认识吕澂的《楞严百伪》有很大的作用,或将推动楞严真伪这一学术公案进入新的里程。 The authenticity of the Shurangama Sutra remains mysterious in academic history.Shurangama Hundred Falseness by Lv Cheng is most influential.However,rebuttal to Lv Cheng at the time of the Republic of China has been neglected for so long because of document shortage.In fact,Lv Cheng was seriously refuted upon his publication.The newly-found materials will provide the matter-of-fact debate over the authenticity of the Shurangama Sutra at that time,and will make an addendum to the concurrent refutations by the eminent monks of the Buddhist circle 79 year ago.These are the key points of this paper,and these new discoveries are helpful in rejudging Lv Cheng’s Shurangama Hundred Falseness,and might a new start of debating the authenticity of Shurangama Sutra.
作者 刘军 Liu Jun
机构地区 南开大学文学院
出处 《文学与文化》 2020年第2期104-114,共11页 Literature and Culture Studies
关键词 吕澂 楞严百伪 新资料 补遗 Lv Cheng Shurangama Hundred Falseness Newly-found Literature Supplement
  • 相关文献

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部