期刊文献+

“21世纪替胡适恢复名誉”辨踪

An Analysis of“Rehabilitation of Hu Shi’s Reputation in The 21st Century”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪中叶的"胡适思想批判"和所谓的"21世纪替胡适恢复名誉",是杂糅了文化、文学、历史等诸多因素的现象。现实地看,所谓"21世纪替胡适恢复名誉"之论往往被视为一种"既存"的"事实",从而引申出各种议论、争鸣。而本文通过追索其源出,并加以推断辨析,认为该论并非事实——至少是一种误读,进而提出自己的理解与倡议。按,学术及学术刊物诚为"公器",刊出此文,一为展示学者对相关文献真伪的思辨——此或可裨益于当代文学思潮研究的背景性认识;二则重在提出作为立论基础的"材料"的问题,期待推进相关的学术考证与争鸣——毕竟,材料可靠与否,事关由此衍生的议题以及依此论证的结论等的意义;此外无他。 The criticism on Hu Shi’s ideology in the mid-20 th century the so-called"Rehabilitation of Hu Shi’s Reputation in The 21 st Century"are the phenomenal mixture of culture,literature,history and many other factors.Realistically,the so-called"Rehabilitation of Hu Shi’s Reputation in The 21 st Century"is often treated as a sort of"existing""fac",resulting in a variety of arguments and debates.This paper,by tracing its origin and by deducing and analyzing,maintains that this argument is not a fact,but a misunderstanding at least,and puts forward its own comprehension and suggestion.Academics and academic publications are"public instruments".The purpose of this paper is to scholars’speculations on the authenticity of the relevant documents,which tends to be beneficial to the background knowledge of contemporary literature ideological trend.Another purpose of this paper is to emphasize on the"material"of the basic argument,and on the promotion of the relevant academic research and argumentation.After all,the reliability of the material matters in reaching the conclusion of the related topics.Nothing matters except this one.
作者 欧阳健 Ouyang Jian
出处 《文学与文化》 2020年第2期125-135,共11页 Literature and Culture Studies
关键词 胡适 批判 考证 Hu Shi Criticism Textual Research
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献6

  • 1王蒙.组织部新来的青年人[J].人民文学.1956(09)
  • 2[郭小川著],郭晓惠执行编辑.郭小川全集[M]. 广西师范大学出版社, 2000
  • 3黎之著.文坛风云录[M]. 河南人民出版社, 1998
  • 4洪子诚著.1956百花时代[M]. 山东教育出版社, 1998
  • 5三联书店辑.胡适思想批判[M]. 三联书店, 1955
  • 6张光年.在颐年堂听毛泽东谈双百方针[J].百年潮,1999,0(4):29-31. 被引量:4

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部