期刊文献+

基于大数据的动车组故障诊断方法研究 被引量:1

Research on Fault Diagnosis Method of Electric Multiple Units Based on Big Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,我国高速铁路发展迅速,取得令人瞩目的成就,动车组因为其安全性、高速性、舒适性、准时性、环保性等特性,越来越得到人们的认可。随着动车组大规模的投入运营,目前已经获得了大量的故障诊断与状态监测数据,通过挖掘和利用蕴含在这些数据背后的价值和规律,来进一步指导动车组的运用维修工作,这对于提高动车组的行车安全具有重大意义。为此通过特征提取、数据分析和数据挖掘等方法,运用Hadoop平台,采用一种基于ADASYN-GBDT决策树算法的动车组故障诊断方法,该方法结合了ADASYN算法和GBDT算法的优点,不仅能够弥补数据分布不平衡给故障诊断带来的缺陷,而且还能够解决现阶段动车组故障诊断中的维修不足、维修过剩、设备故障率问题、维修成本高等一些问题,该方法具有一定的理论和现实意义。 In recent years,China’s high-speed railway has been developed rapidly and achieved remarkable achievements.EMU have gained more and more recognition among Chinese citizens in term of safety,high speed,coziness,punctuality and environmental contribution.With the large-scale operation of the EMU,a large number of data have been obtained on fault diagnosis and condition monitoring up to now.By exploring and utilizing the values and laws behind these data,we can do more work to guide the operation and maintenance of the EMU,which is of great significance.This paper explores and analyzes the data via the Hadoop platform,and adopt EMU fault diagnosis method based on an ADASYN-GBDT decision tree algorithm.This method combines the advantages of ADASYN algorithm and GBDT algorithm,which can not only make up for the defects brought by the imbalanced distribution to fault diagnosis,but also can solve some shortcomings such as insufficient maintenance,over-maintenance,high equipment fault rate as well as high maintenance cost in the current EMU fault diagnosis.Therefore,this method has both theoretical and practical significance.
作者 胡文涛 孟建军 Hu Wentao
机构地区 兰州交通大学
出处 《工业控制计算机》 2020年第6期31-32,35,共3页 Industrial Control Computer
关键词 大数据 动车组 故障诊断 big data EMU fault diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献62

  • 1徐萍,康锐.预测与状态管理系统(PHM)技术研究[J].测控技术,2004,23(12):58-60. 被引量:32
  • 2贾利民,李平,聂阿新.新一代的铁路运输系统——铁路智能运输系统[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2003,1(1):81-86. 被引量:6
  • 3HESS A, FILA L. The joint strike fighter (JSF) PHM Concept: Potential impact on aging aircraft problems[C]. Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 2002, 6: 3021-3026.
  • 4KEITH M J, RAYMOND R B. Diagnostics to Prognostics - A product availability technology evolution[C]. The 53rd Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium(RAMS 2007), Orlando, FL, USA, 2007: 113-118.
  • 5NISHAD P, DIGANTA D, GOEBEL K, et al. Identification of Failure Precursor Parameters for Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs)[C]. 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management(PHM 2008), Denver, CO, USA, 2008: 1-5.
  • 6ANDREW K S, LIN D, BANJEVIC D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics inplementing condition-based maintenance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006,20: 1483-1510.
  • 7MICHAEL G P.Prognostics and health management of electronics[M]. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2008: 3-20.
  • 8ANDREW H, LEO F. The joint strike fighter (JSF) PHM concept: Potential impact on aging aircraft problems[C], Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 2002,6: 3021-3026.
  • 9潘全文 李天 李行善.预测与健康管理系统体系结构研究.电子测量与仪器学报,2007,:32-37.
  • 10HESS A C, FRITH G P. Challenges, issues, and lessons learned chasing the "Big P". Real predictive prognostics. Partl[C]. 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 2005: 3610-3619.

共引文献317

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部