摘要
《医疗纠纷预防和处理条例》中虽然规定了行政调解是处理医疗纠纷的途径之一,但是诉讼优先于行政调解的条款实质限制了行政调解的适用。利用行政调解解决医疗纠纷符合分权和民主集中制的要求。行政调解更为高效,某种程度上讲更能实现实质正义,在解决医疗纠纷中发挥重要的积极意义。应厘清《条例》中行政调解和司法诉讼的关系,使两种途径得到综合运用并有效衔接,以求更好地处理医疗纠纷,构建和谐医疗秩序。
Although the Regulation on Prevention and Treatment of Medical Disputes stipulates that administrative mediation is one of the ways to deal with medical disputes,the provision that litigation takes precedence over administrative mediation substantially limits the application of administrative mediation.The use of administrative mediation to resolve medical disputes conforms to the requirements of decentralization and democratic centralism.Administrative mediation is more efficient and,to some extent,more capable of achieving substantive justice,which plays an important and positive role in resolving medical disputes.The relationship between administrative mediation and judicial litigation in the regulations should be clarified,so that the two approaches can be integrated and effectively linked,so as to deal with medical disputes and build a harmonious medical order.
作者
张玉鹏
Zhang Yupeng(School of law,China University of political science and law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《中国卫生法制》
2020年第4期65-72,98,共9页
China Health Law
关键词
医疗纠纷
行政调解
司法诉讼
Medical dispute
Administrative mediation
Judicial litigation