摘要
诉讼标的理论虽经旧实体法说、诉讼法说、新实体法说的发展,再到相对化的诉讼标的理论,但上述学说都未能完满解决实务中的复杂问题。诉讼标的理论与其在实践当中的适用一直存在严重的脱节。从诉讼标的在行为规范和评价规范下的错位进行考察,认为行为规范下的诉讼标的应在旧实体法说的前提下,坚持处分原则,出现争议时通过法院对当事人的释明或作为焦点问题充分审理,宽松对待或引导当事人进行诉的变更与(客观)合并来加强对当事人的程序保障,作为实现评价规范下诉讼标的及其对应的既判力范围扩张正当化的依据,缓解在诉讼标的旧实体法说下易造成的重复诉讼问题。
The theory of subject matter of claim undergoing the development of the theory of old substantive law,procedural law and new substantive law, and the current theory of dynamic litigation object,its concept has become increasingly refined, however, the theory and practice are disjointed.From the litigation object in the code of conduct and evaluation standards of the dislocation of the investigation, this article claims that the object of action is misaligned under the two standards, and we should stick to the principle of punishment under the old substantive law, and solve the problem of repeated litigation under the old substantive law of subject matter of action by explaining the parties, treating the parties leniently or guiding them to Alteration of Claim and merge the claim(objectively).
作者
周志东
Zhou Zhidong(Law School,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)
出处
《河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版)》
2020年第2期60-66,共7页
Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
诉讼标的
行为规范
评价规范
程序保障
诉的变更与合并
subject matter of claim
code of conduct
code of evaluation
protection of produce
alteration and merger of claim