本土语境下“明确性原则”的功能定位

The Functional Positioning of the Principle of Clarity in the Native Context

明确性原则作为舶来品,必须在本土语境下进行研究和发展。关于明确性内容和判断标准的研究日趋成熟,但是关于明确性原则的概念是混淆的,这就导致明确性原则在我国的理论基础薄弱、发挥功能有限、实现途径艰难。明确性原则的概念应当从形式侧面和实质侧面两个角度进行理解。关于形式侧面,应从思想渊源与立法沿革出发,强调精神引领和价值评价。关于实质侧面,应从比较研究视野中的理论需求和实践基础出发,强调与宪法的良性互动、制度构建。在坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度、推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的背景下,为了发挥明确性原则的功能,必须加快推进合宪性审查工作。

As an important exotic concept, the principle of clarity must be researched and developed in the local context. The research on the content and judgment standards of the principle of clarity is becoming more and more mature, but the concept of the principle of clarity is confusing, which leads to the weak theoretical foundation, limited function and difficult realization of the principle of clarity in China. The concept of the principle of clarity should be understood from two perspectives: the formal side and the substantive side. Regarding the formal side, we should start from the origin of thought and legislative history, and emphasize spiritual guidance and value evaluation. Regarding the substantive aspect, we should proceed from the theoretical needs and practical basis in the perspective of comparative research, and emphasize its positive interaction with the constitution and the construction of the system. In the context of "adhering to and improving the socialist system with Chinese characteristics, advancing the modernization of the national governance system and governance capabilities", it is necessary to accelerate the review of constitutionality in order to play the function of the principle of clarity.