马克思恩格斯研究的思想史方法及其限度——与西方“马克思学”的批判对话

The Method and Limitation of the Ideological History of Marx and Engels——Critical Dialogue with Western“Marxism”

西方“马克思学”在学术发展日趋规范之后,先后发展出文献考订法、思想阐释法和差异分析法等具有自身特殊性的规范化研究方法,并在近四十年中表露出一种明显的方法论的“解释学转向”。这些思想史研究方法客观上曾经促进了我国马克思恩格斯研究的科学发展,但是建设“21世纪马克思主义”又提出了新要求。通过与西方“马克思学”的批判对话,一方面需要历史认识与把握这些思想史研究方法,另一方面需要批判神话这些研究方法的做法,认识到这些方法的限度。在充分吸收借鉴包括西方“马克思学”在内的国际先进经验的基础上,创新具有中国特色的马克思恩格斯思想史研究方法体系。

After the western“Marxism”is becoming more and more standardized,it has developed its own special standardized research methods,such as literature review method,ideological interpretation method and difference analysis method.In the past 40 years,it has shown an obvious“hermeneutic turn”of methodology.These research methods of ideological history have objectively promoted the scientific development of Marx and Engels research in China,but the construction of Marxism in the 21st century puts forward new requirements for us.On the one hand,we need to understand and grasp these research methods,on the other hand,we need to criticize these research methods of myth and realize their limits.On the basis of fully absorbing and drawing on the international advanced experience including western“Marxism”,we should innovate the research method system of Marx and Engels’ideological history with Chinese characteristics.