留守经历大学生童年期创伤的影响因素

Determinants of childhood trauma among college students with left-behind experience

目的探讨留守经历大学生童年期创伤的影响因素,为有效干预留守经历对个体的负性影响提供参考。方法采用分层整群抽样方法,抽取天津5所高校和2所高等职业院校的2 468名学生,使用自编问卷和童年期创伤问卷开展调查。结果留守经历学生在情感虐待、性虐待、情感忽视、躯体忽视和童年期创伤总分上高于无留守经历学生(t值分别为3.01,3.13,3.24,2.27,3.60,P值均<0.05);父母外出情况和父母回来频率对留守经历大学生童年期创伤总分存在交互作用(F=2.37,P<0.05);性别与生源、父母外出时对象年龄、父母外出累积时间和同父母联系频率的交互作用下对留守经历学生童年期创伤总分主效应均有统计学意义(F值分别为4.49,5.23,5.93,5.11,P值均<0.05);父母离家时对象年龄与生源、性别、是否独生、父母外出情况和父母回来频率的交互作用下,以及同父母联系频率与生源、性别、是否独生和父母外出累积时间的交互作用下主效应均有统计学意义(F值分别为3.88,4.25,3.32,2.86,3.45;3.82,4.02,2.64,3.29,P值均<0.05)。结论有必要高度重视相关人口学和留守信息对留守经历学生身心健康的影响,以更有针对性地开展相应预防和治疗工作。

Objective To explore determinants of childhood trauma among college students with left-behind experience,and to provide a reference for effective intervention among students with left-behind experience. Methods A total of 2 468 students selected from 5 universities and 2 higher vocational colleges in tianjin by stratified cluster sampling method were investigated by selfcompiled questionnaire and childhood trauma questionnaire. Results The scores in emotional abuse,sexual abuse,emotional neglect,physical neglect and childhood trauma of students with left-behind experience were significantly higher than those without leftbehind experience( t = 3.01,3.13,3.24,2.27,3.60,P<0.05);parental separation times and the frequency of parental return had significant interaction effect on the total score of childhood trauma of students with left-behind experience( F = 2.37,P< 0.05);the gender had a significant major effect on the total score of childhood trauma of students with left-behind experience under the interaction with the place of origin,age at first separation,the cumulative time of left-behind experiences and the frequency of parents contacting( F = 4.49,5.23,5.93,5.11,P<0.05);the age of subjects when parents going out under the interaction with the place of origin,the gender,if only-child,parental separation times and the frequency of parental return;as well as the frequency of parents contacting under the interaction with the place of origin,the household registration,the gender,if only-child and the cumulative time of left-behind experiences also had significantly main effect( F = 3.88,4.25,3.32,2.86,3.45;3.82,4.02,2.64,3.29,P<0.05).Conclusion It is necessary to attach great importance to demographic and context information regarding left-behind experiences,which lead to more specific and effective prevention and intervention strategy for individual with left-behind experiences.