期刊文献+

“一带一路”沿线国家恐怖主义风险研究 被引量:1

Research on Terrorism Risks of the Countries along“The Belt and Road Initiative”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “一带一路”沿线地区恐怖主义泛滥、恐怖袭击多发,直接影响到“一带一路”倡议的实施。预防沿线国家非传统风险,评估沿线国家恐怖主义风险,防控恐怖袭击,保障“一带一路”倡议顺利推进和我国海外利益安全,成为现实而紧迫的问题。因此,基于对“一带一路”沿线61个国家21435起恐怖袭击案例的剖析,分析“一带一路”沿线国家恐怖主义现状,结合通用风险评估指标公式,结果显示,“一带一路”沿线六个地区的总体风险在不断增加,其中,东欧、中东和北非、南亚及东南亚遭受恐怖主义袭击的风险大幅上升。因此,我们要固本强基,进一步加强反恐怖国际合作,积极推动走出去的安保战略,严防恐怖主义袭击在“一带一路”倡议实施中给我国带来的负影响。 Rampant terrorism and frequent terrorist attacks in the countries along“The Belt and Road Initiative”directly threat the initiative implementation.It is urgent that the measures of non-traditional risks prevention,terrorism risks assessment and terrorist attacks control should be taken to ensure smooth progress of“The Belt and Road Initiative”and safeguard China’s overseas security.Therefore,based on 21,435 cases of terrorist attacks in 61 countries along“The Belt and Road Initiative”,this paper analyzes the current situation in these countries with the general risk assessment indicator formula.The results show that the overall risk of six regions is increasing,especially Eastern Europe,the Middle East and North Africa,South Asia and Southeast Asia.In order to prevent the negative impact of terrorist attacks on China in the implementation of“The Belt and Road Initiative”,measures should be taken to consolidate the foundation,strengthen international anti-terrorism cooperation,and actively promote the security strategy of going global.
作者 石艳芳 师若文 SHI Yanfang;SHI Ruowen(School of Criminal Justice,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou Henan 450000,China;Koguan School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China)
出处 《河南警察学院学报》 2020年第3期18-27,共10页 Journal of Henan Police College
基金 河南省社科规划项目“‘独狼’恐怖主义法律问题研究”(2018CFX019) 国家社科后期资助项目“个体恐怖犯罪问题研究”(18FFX055) 河南省法学会“‘一带一路’沿线国家恐怖主义风险评估研究”(HNLS(2018)B25)的阶段性成果。
关键词 “一带一路” 恐怖主义 风险评估 国家安全 “The Belt and Road Initiative” terrorism risk assessment national security
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1KEET C M.Terrorism and game theory[D].Ireland:University of Limerick,2003.
  • 2MAJOR J A.Advanced techniques for modeling terrorism risk[J].Journal of Risk Finance,2002,4(1):15-24.
  • 3WOO G.Quantitative terrorism risk assessment[J].Journal of Risk Finance,2002,4(1):7-14.
  • 4BIER W,ABHICHANDANI V.Optimal allocation of resources for defense of simple series and parallel systems from determined adversaries[J].Decision Analysis Society,2003,5(2):59-76.
  • 5BANKS D L,ANDERSON S.Combining game theory and risk analysis in counter-terrorism:a smallpox example[R].ASA-SIAM Monograph Statistics and Counterterrorism,2005.
  • 6HAUSKEN K.Probabilistic risk analysis and game theory[J].Risk Analysis,2002,22(1):17-27.
  • 7POWERS M R.The terror of the “Black Box”[J].Journal of Risk Finance,2005,6(4):292-293.
  • 8SHI Xiquan(施锡铨).Game theory (博弈论)[M].Shanghai:Shanghai University of Finance & Economics Press,2000.
  • 9Boyd GJ, St,Pierre G.Risk management program for the disposal of chemical agents and munitions[].Society for Risk Analysis:Special Symposium on Quantitative Risk Assessment.
  • 10USNRC (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission).Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risks in US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants[].WASH- NUREG-/.1975

共引文献35

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部