摘要
《刑法修正案(八)》规定的“禁止令”和《刑法修正案(九)》规定的“从业禁止”,标志着刑事职业禁止作为一种预防再犯的措施被引入我国刑法典。现阶段我国在侵犯知识产权罪刑事治理中职业禁止适用率低且立法上存在一定的不周延性。我国有必要在刑法分则和知识产权法律规范中明确刑事职业禁止的规定,在比例原则和合宪性理念前提下,扩大适用范围至单位犯罪,构建复权制度,以促进我国对侵犯知识产权罪刑事治理水平的提升。
The"prohibition order"stipulated in the Criminal Law Amendment VIII and the"occupation prohibition"stipulated in the Criminal Law Amendment IX mark that the criminal occupation prohibition,as a measure to prevent recidivism,is introduced into China’s criminal code.At present,the application rate of occupation prohibition in the intellectual property crime is still low and there is certain degree of indistribution in the legislation.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the criminal occupation prohibition in specific provisions of criminal law and intellectual property legal regulations,to expand the scope of application to unit crimes under the principle of proportionality and constitutionality,and to establish a right recovery system,so as to enhance the criminal governance of intellectual property crime in China.
作者
贺志军
胡江涛
HE Zhijun;HU Jiangtao(Hunan Technology and Business University,Changsha Hunan 410025,China)
出处
《河南警察学院学报》
2020年第3期76-83,共8页
Journal of Henan Police College
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“互联网领域知识产权犯罪刑事治理研究”(16BFX054)的阶段性成果。
关键词
职业禁止
侵犯知识产权罪
非刑罚措施
复权
occupation prohibition
intellectual property crime
non-penalty measures
right recovery